Literature DB >> 20880098

The prevalence of wasting in Czech infants: a comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the Czech growth references.

Jana Vignerová1, Markéta Paulová, Lenka H Shriver, Jitka Riedlová, Dagmar Schneidrová, Eva Kudlová, Lída Lhotská.   

Abstract

The objective of this descriptive study was to evaluate the performance of the international World Health Organization (WHO) child growth standards in the Czech Republic and determine the prevalence of wasting among children using the 1991 Czech growth reference and the WHO growth standards. The study utilized the 2006 WHO Child Growth Standards and the 1991 Czech growth references. The WHO standards were based on a longitudinal study of 882 children aged 0-24 months and on cross-sectional studies of 6669 children aged 18-71 months. The 1991 Czech growth references were based on a cross-sectional survey including 90 910 children aged 0-18 years (34 164 were children aged < 5 years). The prevalence of wasting was significantly higher among Czech children when using the WHO growth standards compared with the Czech references. The prevalence of wasting among 0-5-month-old children was 15.5% among boys and 12.9% among girls compared with the expected 2.3% of the WHO standards. In the length category of 50 cm, 9.0% of boys and 9.9% of girls fell under the WHO wasting cut-off compared with the 3% from the Czech growth reference. The application of the WHO growth standards may results in a significant increase of Czech children classified in the category of wasting, especially among infants aged 0-5 months. The performance and potential impacts of the WHO growth standards should be evaluated further before their adoption in the Czech Republic and other countries with local growth references.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20880098      PMCID: PMC6860705          DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2010.00275.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  14 in total

1.  Worldwide practices in child growth monitoring.

Authors:  Mercedes de Onis; Trudy M A Wijnhoven; Adelheid W Onyango
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Comparison of the prevalence of shortness, underweight, and overweight among US children aged 0 to 59 months by using the CDC 2000 and the WHO 2006 growth charts.

Authors:  Zuguo Mei; Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Field testing of the 2006 World Health Organization growth charts from birth to 2 years: assessment of hospital undernutrition and overnutrition rates and the usefulness of BMI.

Authors:  Andrea Nash; Donna Secker; Mary Corey; Michael Dunn; Deborah L O'Connor
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Breastfeeding, growth and growth standards: Performance of the WHO growth standards for monitoring growth of Belgian children.

Authors:  Mathieu Roelants; Roland Hauspie; Karel Hoppenbrouwers
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Operational implications of using 2006 World Health Organization growth standards in nutrition programmes: secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Seal; Marko Kerac
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-23

6.  The LMS method for constructing normalized growth standards.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Using the new World Health Organisation growth standards: differences from 3 countries.

Authors:  Bridget Fenn; Mary E Penny
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 8.  Rationale for developing a new international growth reference.

Authors:  Cutberto Garza; Mercedes de Onis
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.069

9.  Assessing the impact of the introduction of the World Health Organization growth standards and weight-for-height z-score criterion on the response to treatment of severe acute malnutrition in children: secondary data analysis.

Authors:  Sheila Isanaka; Eduardo Villamor; Susan Shepherd; Rebecca F Grais
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  C Wright; R Lakshman; P Emmett; K K Ong
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of National Growth Standards for Turkish Infants and Children with World Health Organization Growth Standards

Authors:  Rüveyde Bundak; Zehra Yavaş Abalı; Andrzej Furman; Feyza Darendeliler; Gülbin Gökçay; Firdevs Baş; Hülya Günöz; Olcay Neyzi
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  A recurrent deletion on chromosome 2q13 is associated with developmental delay and mild facial dysmorphisms.

Authors:  Eva Hladilkova; Tuva Barøy; Madeleine Fannemel; Vladimira Vallova; Doriana Misceo; Vesna Bryn; Iva Slamova; Sarka Prasilova; Petr Kuglik; Eirik Frengen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Reappraisal of Regional Growth Charts in the Era of WHO Growth Standards.

Authors:  Jin Soo Moon
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  Improving accuracy and usability of growth charts: case study in Rwanda.

Authors:  Suzana Brown; Patrick McSharry
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The Low Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in Czech Breastfed Infants and Young Children: An Anthropological Survey.

Authors:  Jitka Riedlová; Markéta Paulová; Jana Vignerová; Marek Brabec; Petr Sedlak; Dagmar Schneidrová
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.