OBJECTIVE: Assessment of early postoperative activity is important in the documentation of improvements of peri-operative care. This study was designed to validate computerized activity-based monitoring of physical activity and sleep (actigraphy) in patients after abdominal surgery. METHODS: The study included twelve hospitalized patients after major abdominal surgery studied on day 2 to 4 after operation and twelve unhospitalized healthy volunteers. Measurements were performed for 24 consecutive hours. The actigraphy measurements were compared with self-reported activity- and sleep registration. The actigraphy output was obtained by the zero-crossing mode (ZCM) and time-above-threshold mode (TATM). RESULTS: The overall results showed comparable mean agreement between actigraphy and self-reported activity registrations for patients of 80% (SD 12%) and volunteers of 84% (SD 6%) (p = 0.15). In both study groups, all correlation coefficients between actigraphy measurements and self-reported activity data were statistically significant (r, values for patients 0.4 to 0.8 and volunteers 0.6 to 0.9). A higher mean agreement between automated actigraphy sleep detection and self-reported sleep registration were found in the volunteers (85%, SD 15%) compared with the patients (77%, SD 11%) (p < 0.05). The mean activity value awake was higher in the volunteers than in the patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Computerized activity monitoring by actigraphy is a reliable and easy method for monitoring physical activity and sleep-wake cycles after major abdominal surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of early postoperative activity is important in the documentation of improvements of peri-operative care. This study was designed to validate computerized activity-based monitoring of physical activity and sleep (actigraphy) in patients after abdominal surgery. METHODS: The study included twelve hospitalized patients after major abdominal surgery studied on day 2 to 4 after operation and twelve unhospitalized healthy volunteers. Measurements were performed for 24 consecutive hours. The actigraphy measurements were compared with self-reported activity- and sleep registration. The actigraphy output was obtained by the zero-crossing mode (ZCM) and time-above-threshold mode (TATM). RESULTS: The overall results showed comparable mean agreement between actigraphy and self-reported activity registrations for patients of 80% (SD 12%) and volunteers of 84% (SD 6%) (p = 0.15). In both study groups, all correlation coefficients between actigraphy measurements and self-reported activity data were statistically significant (r, values for patients 0.4 to 0.8 and volunteers 0.6 to 0.9). A higher mean agreement between automated actigraphy sleep detection and self-reported sleep registration were found in the volunteers (85%, SD 15%) compared with the patients (77%, SD 11%) (p < 0.05). The mean activity value awake was higher in the volunteers than in the patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Computerized activity monitoring by actigraphy is a reliable and easy method for monitoring physical activity and sleep-wake cycles after major abdominal surgery.
Authors: Hannah R Maybrier; C Rya King; Amanda E Crawford; Angela M Mickle; Daniel A Emmert; Troy S Wildes; Michael S Avidan; Ben Julian A Palanca Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Linda Basse; Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen; Linda Bardram; Per Billesbølle; Claus Lund; Torben Mogensen; Jacob Rosenberg; Henrik Kehlet Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Melissa Voigt Hansen; Michael Tvilling Madsen; Ida Hageman; Lars Simon Rasmussen; Susanne Bokmand; Jacob Rosenberg; Ismail Gögenur Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kristin E Schwab; An Q To; Jennifer Chang; Bonnie Ronish; Dale M Needham; Jennifer L Martin; Biren B Kamdar Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 2.889
Authors: Stéphanie A Prince; Kristi B Adamo; Meghan E Hamel; Jill Hardt; Sarah Connor Gorber; Mark Tremblay Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 6.457