Literature DB >> 12576845

Comparative study of sclerotherapy with phenol and surgical treatment for hydrocele.

Chen Jen Shan1, Antonio Marmo Lucon, Sami Arap.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared the efficiency, side effects and effects on spermatogenesis of sclerotherapy with phenol and surgical treatment for hydrocele.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 67 patients (80 hydroceles) were randomly divided into 2 groups of 40 hydroceles each. One group underwent phenol sclerotherapy and the other underwent hydrocelectomy. Spermiograms were done before, 6 and 12 months after treatment in patients able to ejaculate.
RESULTS: In the sclerotherapy group 47.5%, 30%, 12.5%, 5% and 2.5% of the hydroceles were cured with 1 to 5 injections, respectively, but 2.5% were not cured even with 6 injections. There were no complaints of localized pain or infection in these cases. All patients returned to normal activity on the same day. In the hydrocelectomy group 97.5% and 2.5% of hydroceles were cured with 1 and 2 operations, respectively. There was pain postoperatively in 73.5% of the patients and localized infection in 5%, while 62.5% required an average of 4.5 days of rest and were absent from work for 10 days. There was no significant statistical alteration in spermatozoid concentration in the preoperative, and 6 and 12-month postoperative counts in the groups (p = 0.385).
CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy for hydrocele with phenol is as efficacious as hydrocelectomy, while causing less morbidity and similar effects on spermatogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576845     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000052680.03705.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of hydrocele in adolescent patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Classifying Hydroceles of the Pelvis and Groin: An Overview of Etiology, Secondary Complications, Evaluation, and Management.

Authors:  Gautam Dagur; Jason Gandhi; Yiji Suh; Steven Weissbart; Yefim R Sheynkin; Noel L Smith; Gargi Joshi; Sardar Ali Khan
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-03-30

3.  Endoscopic versus open hydrocelectomy for the treatment of adult hydroceles: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Levent Emir; Melih Sunay; Mümtaz Dadalı; Yakup Karakaya; Demokan Erol
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Sclerotherapy for hydrocele revisited: a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  M S Agrawal; H Yadav; A Upadhyay; R Jaiman; J Singhal; A K Singh
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  A comparison of a novel endoscopic "Su-Wang technique" with the open "Jaboulay's procedure" for the surgical treatment of adult primary vaginal hydrocele.

Authors:  Junhao Lei; Chunhua Luo; Yangyang Zhang; Yuming Guo; Xinjun Su; Xinghuan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of outcomes and costs of surgery versus sclerotherapy to treat hydrocele.

Authors:  Fernando Korkes; Saulo Borborema Teles; Matheus Prado Nascimento; Samira Scalso de Almeida; Artur Martins Codeço
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-07-16

7.  Recurrent hydrocoele.

Authors:  Kelly Parks; Lawrence Leung
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2013-01

8.  Minimally access versus conventional hydrocelectomy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Aly Saber
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.