Literature DB >> 12576367

Lymph node size and metastatic infiltration in non-small cell lung cancer.

Klaus L Prenzel1, Stefan P Mönig, Jan M Sinning, Stephan E Baldus, Hans-Georg Brochhagen, Paul M Schneider, Arnulf H Hölscher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative lymph node staging of lung cancer by CT relies on the premise that malignant lymph nodes are larger than benign ones. Lymph nodes > 1 cm in size are regarded as metastatic nodes. The surgical approach and potential application of neoadjuvant therapy regimens are dependent on this evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a morphometric study, hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes from 256 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were analyzed. The lymph nodes were counted, the largest diameter of each lymph node was measured, and each lymph node was analyzed for metastatic involvement by histopathologic examination. The frequency of metastatic involvement was calculated and correlated with lymph node size. Preoperative CT scans of 80 patients were retrospectively analyzed by a staff radiologist. Lymph node size was measured, and lymph nodes were evaluated due to radiologic criteria. The radiologic evaluation was compared to the histopathologic diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 2,891 lymph nodes were present in the 256 specimens examined for this study. One hundred thirty-nine patients had a pN0 status, whereas 117 patients had lymph nodes that were positive for cancer. Two thousand four hundred eighty-six lymph nodes (86%) were tumor-free, while 405 (14%) showed metastatic involvement on histopathologic examination. The mean (+/- SD) diameter of the nonmetastatic lymph nodes was 7.05 +/- 3.75 mm, whereas infiltrated nodes had a diameter of 10.7 +/- 4.7 mm (p = 0.005). One thousand nine hundred fifty-three of the tumor-free lymph nodes (79%) and 170 of the metastatic lymph nodes (44%) were < 10 mm in diameter. Of 139 patients with no metastatic lymph node involvement, 101 (77%) had at least one lymph node that was > 10 mm in diameter. Of 127 patients with metastatic lymph node involvement, 12% had no lymph node that was < 10 mm. The independent radiologic evaluation of the CT scans of 80 patients yielded a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 80.6%.
CONCLUSION: Lymph node size is not a reliable parameter for the evaluation of metastatic involvement in patients with NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12576367     DOI: 10.1378/chest.123.2.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  31 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Christoph Frank Dietrich; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Evaluation of lymph node metastasis in lung cancer: who is the chief justice?

Authors:  Yang Xia; Bin Zhang; Hao Zhang; Wen Li; Ko-Pen Wang; Huahao Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  New ultrasound techniques for lymph node evaluation.

Authors:  Xin-Wu Cui; Christian Jenssen; Adrian Saftoiu; Andre Ignee; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Size of noncancerous hilomediastinal lymph nodes measured on coronal and sagittal reconstruction CT images.

Authors:  Mizue Hasegawa; Fumikazu Sakai; Fumiko Kimura; Kaiji Inoue; Atsushi Nagai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 5.  Defining the role of modern imaging techniques in assessing lymph nodes for metastasis in cancer: evolving contribution of PET in this setting.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Sandip Basu; Drew A Torigian; Babak Saboury; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Majem; J Hernández-Hernández; F Hernando-Trancho; N Rodríguez de Dios; A Sotoca; J C Trujillo-Reyes; I Vollmer; R Delgado-Bolton; M Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Size and histologic characteristics of lymph node material retrieved from tissue discarded after routine pathologic examination of lung cancer resection specimens.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Robert A Ramirez; Christopher G Wang; Laura E Miller; Laura McHugh; Courtney A Adair; Matthew P Smeltzer; Xinhua Yu; Allen Berry
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.090

8.  CT evaluation of paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with biliary cancer.

Authors:  Takehiro Noji; Satoshi Kondo; Satoshi Hirano; Eiichi Tanaka; Yoshiyasu Ambo; Yo Kawarada; Toshiaki Morikawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Improving CT detection sensitivity for nodal metastases in oesophageal cancer with combination of smaller size and lymph node axial ratio.

Authors:  Jianfang Liu; Zhu Wang; Huafei Shao; Dong Qu; Jian Liu; Libo Yao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Morphometric analysis of regional lymph nodes in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hajimu Gotoh; Naoki Kanomata; Masahiro Yoshimura; Yoshiharu Ohno; Takuya Moriya; Chiho Ohbayashi
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.