Literature DB >> 24636044

Size and histologic characteristics of lymph node material retrieved from tissue discarded after routine pathologic examination of lung cancer resection specimens.

Raymond U Osarogiagbon1, Robert A Ramirez2, Christopher G Wang3, Laura E Miller4, Laura McHugh5, Courtney A Adair6, Matthew P Smeltzer7, Xinhua Yu7, Allen Berry8.   

Abstract

Redissection of discarded lung resection specimens after routine pathology examination reveals missed lymph node metastasis. We sought to determine if size can be used to grossly select lymph nodes for microscopic examination. This is a prospective cohort study of lymph nodes retrieved from discarded lung resection specimens. The association between size and histologic characteristics of retrieved material was compared by the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. We retrieved 1094 grossly 'lymph node-like" tissue from 112 remnant lung resection specimens, of which 345 (32%) proved not to be lymph nodes and 71 (9%) of 749 lymph nodes had metastasis. Metastasis was present in discarded nodes in 26 (23%) of 112 patients. The non-lymph node tissue was significantly smaller than lymph nodes (P < .0001); lymph nodes with metastases were significantly larger than those without metastases (P < .0001). However, there was significant size overlap between the 3 types of grossly lymph node-like tissue. Thirty-two percent of nodes with metastasis were less than 1 cm; 15% of patients had at least 1 lymph node less than 1 cm with metastasis. The size difference between lymph nodes with and without metastasis is clinically unhelpful because of broad overlap. Size is insufficiently discriminatory and cannot be relied on to select materials for histologic examination. A third of grossly retrieved material was non-lymph node tissue. This probably occurs during routine pathologic examination and likely contributes to the low N1 lymph node count.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nodal metastasis; Quality of care; Staging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24636044      PMCID: PMC4029860          DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol        ISSN: 1092-9134            Impact factor:   2.090


  23 in total

1.  Recommendations for processing and reporting of lymph node specimens submitted for evaluation of metastatic disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Incomplete intrapulmonary lymph node retrieval after routine pathologic examination of resected lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Ramirez; Christopher G Wang; Laura E Miller; Courtney A Adair; Allen Berry; Xinhua Yu; Thomas F O'Brien; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prognostic implication of metastasis limited to segmental (level 13) and/or subsegmental (level 14) lymph nodes in patients with surgically resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and pathologic N1 lymph node status.

Authors:  Akiko Miyagi Maeshima; Koji Tsuta; Hisao Asamura; Hitoshi Tsuda
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Number of lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio are associated with survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  Chukwumere E Nwogu; Adrienne Groman; Daniel Fahey; Sai Yendamuri; Elisabeth Dexter; Todd L Demmy; Austin Miller; Mary Reid
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Mediastinal lymph node examination and survival in resected early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Xinhua Yu
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Which is the better prognostic factor for resected non-small cell lung cancer: the number of metastatic lymph nodes or the currently used nodal stage classification?

Authors:  Shenhai Wei; Hisao Asamura; Riken Kawachi; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Shun-ichi Watanabe
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Validation of the lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in patients with N1 nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sirisha Jonnalagadda; Jacqueline Arcinega; Cardinale Smith; Juan P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Number of lymph nodes harvested from a mediastinal lymphadenectomy: results of the randomized, prospective American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 trial.

Authors:  Gail E Darling; Mark S Allen; Paul A Decker; Karla Ballman; Richard A Malthaner; Richard I Inculet; David R Jones; Robert J McKenna; Rodney J Landreneau; Joe B Putnam
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Nonexamination of lymph nodes and survival after resection of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Xinhua Yu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Number of lymph nodes associated with maximal reduction of long-term mortality risk in pathologic node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Obiageli Ogbata; Xinhua Yu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Enlarged Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Computed Tomography are a Valuable Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Pathologically Negative Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Yuansheng Zheng; Yiwei Huang; Guoshu Bi; Zhencong Chen; Tao Lu; Songtao Xu; Cheng Zhan; Qun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Missed Intrapulmonary Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival After Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew P Smeltzer; Nicholas Faris; Xinhua Yu; Robert A Ramirez; Laura E M Ramirez; Christopher G Wang; Courtney Adair; Allen Berry; Raymond U Osarogiagbon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Survival Implications of Variation in the Thoroughness of Pathologic Lymph Node Examination in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 (Alliance).

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Paul A Decker; Karla Ballman; Dennis Wigle; Mark S Allen; Gail E Darling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Comparison of the gas-liquid dual support fixation and Heitzman fixation techniques for preparing lung specimens.

Authors:  Dongsheng Yu; Weili Qu; Haipeng Xia; Xiaofeng Li; Zhenfeng Luan; Renjie Yan; Xiaodong Lu; Peng Zhao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Nodal size ranking as a predictor of mediastinal involvement in clinical early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Cristina Caupena; Roser Costa; Francisco Pérez-Ochoa; Sergi Call; Àngels Jaen; Ramón Rami-Porta; Carme Obiols; Lluis Esteban; Raquel Albero-González; Luis Antonio Luizaga; Mireia Serra; Josep Belda; Xavier Tarroch; José Sanz-Santos
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.