Literature DB >> 12575905

A randomised four-intervention crossover study investigating the effect of carbohydrates on daytime profiles of insulin, glucose, non-esterified fatty acids and triacylglycerols in middle-aged men.

Audrey E Brynes1, C Mark Edwards, Mohammed A Ghatei, Anne Dornhorst, Linda M Morgan, Stephen R Bloom, Gary S Frost.   

Abstract

Postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin and triacylglycerols (TG) correlate to risk for CHD. Carbohydrates affect many metabolites that could have a potential effect on cardiovascular risk factors. The objective of the present study was to examine, using a randomised prospective study, the acute (day 1) and ad libitum medium-term (day 24) effects of four diets: a high-fat diet (HIGH-FAT; 50 % fat, >34 % monounsaturated fatty acids); a low-glycaemic index (GI) diet (LOW-GI; high-carbohydrate, low-GI); a high-sucrose diet (SUCROSE; high carbohydrate increase of 90 g sucrose/d); a high-GI diet (HIGH-GI; high-carbohydrate, high-GI). Daytime profiles (8 h) (breakfast, lunch and tea) of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism were completed during day 1 and day 24. Seventeen middle-aged men with one or more cardiac risk factors completed the study. There was no change from day 1 or between diets in fasting glucose, lipids or homeostatic assessment model (HOMA) on day 24. The HIGH-FAT compared with the three high-carbohydrate diets was associated with lower postprandial insulin and glucose but higher postprandial TG and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). There was a significant increase in the 6 h (15.00 hours) TG concentration (day 1, 2.6 (sem 0.3) mmol/l v. day 24, 3.3 (sem 0.3) mmol/l; P<0.01) on the SUCROSE diet. Postprandial HOMA (i.e. incremental area under the curve (IAUC) glucose (mmol/l per min)xIAUC insulin/22.5 (mU/l per min)) median changes from day 1 to day 24 were -61, -43, -20 and +31 % for the HIGH-FAT, LOW-GI, SUCROSE and HIGH-GI diets respectively. The HIGH-GI percentage change was significantly different from the other three diets (P<0.001). Despite being advised to maintain an identical energy intake there was a significant weight change (-0.27 (sem 0.3) kg; P<0.02) on the LOW-GI diet compared with the SUCROSE diet (+0.84 (sem 0.3) kg). In conclusion the HIGH-FAT diet had a beneficial effect on postprandial glucose and insulin over time but it was associated with higher postprandial concentrations of TG and NEFA. Conversely the HIGH-GI diet appeared to increase postprandial insulin resistance over the study period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12575905     DOI: 10.1079/BJN2002769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  26 in total

1.  Cumulative soft drink consumption is associated with insulin resistance in Mexican adults.

Authors:  Berenice Rivera-Paredez; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Romina González-Morales; Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Rubí Hernández-López; Paula Ramírez; Leith León-Maldonado; Rafael Velázquez-Cruz; Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez; Jorge Salmerón
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease.

Authors:  E E Blaak; J-M Antoine; D Benton; I Björck; L Bozzetto; F Brouns; M Diamant; L Dye; T Hulshof; J J Holst; D J Lamport; M Laville; C L Lawton; A Meheust; A Nilson; S Normand; A A Rivellese; S Theis; S S Torekov; S Vinoy
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 3.  Optimal dietary approaches for prevention of type 2 diabetes: a life-course perspective.

Authors:  A E Buyken; P Mitchell; A Ceriello; J Brand-Miller
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Postprandial lipid responses to standard carbohydrates used to determine glycaemic index values.

Authors:  Sonia Vega-López; Lynne M Ausman; Nirupa R Matthan; Alice H Lichtenstein
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Effect of brown rice, white rice, and brown rice with legumes on blood glucose and insulin responses in overweight Asian Indians: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Viswanathan Mohan; Donna Spiegelman; Vasudevan Sudha; Rajagopal Gayathri; Biling Hong; Kallingal Praseena; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Nicole M Wedick; Kokila Arumugam; Vasanti Malik; Sabitha Ramachandran; Mookambika Ramya Bai; Jeya Kumar Henry; Frank B Hu; Walter Willett; Kamala Krishnaswamy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Glycemic index and glycemic load of carbohydrates in the diabetes diet.

Authors:  Kate Marsh; Alan Barclay; Stephen Colagiuri; Jennie Brand-Miller
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  NEFA minimal model parameters estimated from the oral glucose tolerance test and the meal tolerance test.

Authors:  Ray C Boston; Peter J Moate
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Beneficial effect of a weight-stable, low-fat/low-saturated fat/low-glycaemic index diet to reduce liver fat in older subjects.

Authors:  Kristina M Utzschneider; Jennifer L Bayer-Carter; Matthew D Arbuckle; Jaime M Tidwell; Todd L Richards; Suzanne Craft
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.718

9.  The effects of energy-rich diets on discrimination reversal learning and on BDNF in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex of the rat.

Authors:  Scott E Kanoski; Robert L Meisel; Amanda J Mullins; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  The glycemic index and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Jennie Brand-Miller; Scott Dickinson; Alan Barclay; David Celermajer
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.