Literature DB >> 12575794

Chromosome arrangement and behaviour of two rye homologous telosomes at the onset of meiosis in disomic wheat-5RL addition lines with and without the Ph1 locus.

Belén Maestra1, J Hans de Jong, Ken Shepherd, Tomás Naranjo.   

Abstract

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) of total genomic and repetitive DNA on microsporocytes of ditelocentric addition lines of rye 5RL in hexaploid wheat was performed to study the behaviour of the rye homologous chromosome arms in relation to centromere and telomere dynamics at premeiotic interphase and meiotic prophase I. By comparing isogenic lines with and without the Ph1 locus, we established the effect of the Ph1 gene on appearance and behaviour of the rye chromosomes. Ph1 and ph1b lines demonstrated similar premeiotic chromosome arrangement with the two rye homologues occupying separated domains despite the occurrence of centromere association. Our study confirmed that bouquet arrangement of telomeres follows the Rabl configuration. In cells displaying bouquet clustering of telomeres, centromeres of the 5RL telosomes are still at the opposite pole, suggesting anchoring of centromeres at the cytoskeleton. Once the telomeres complete clustering, the rye centromeres migrate to the telomere pole, and the rye chromosomes begin to loosen their structure. While the rye homologues in the wild-type keep separate territories in the nucleus, they become intermingled in the ph1b mutant, possibly because of their lower condensation. In a subsequent stage, the 5RL homologues appear intimately associated mainly at the distal region. Our study suggests that the lower rate of chromosome synapsis in the ph1b mutant results from abnormal chromatin decondensation and organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12575794     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021564327226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  25 in total

Review 1.  Inferences from genetical evidence on the course of meiotic chromosome pairing in plants.

Authors:  G A Dover; R Riley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1977-03-21       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The initiation of meiotic chromosome pairing: the cytological view.

Authors:  J Loidl
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.166

3.  The effect of chromosomes 5B, 5D, and 5A on chromosomal pairing in triticum aestivum.

Authors:  M Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fine physical mapping of Ph1, a chromosome pairing regulator gene in polyploid wheat.

Authors:  K S Gill; B S Gill; T R Endo; Y Mukai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Chromosome pairing: effect of colchicine on an isochromosome.

Authors:  C J Driscoll; N L Darvey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The development and meiotic behavior of asymmetrical isochromosomes in wheat.

Authors:  A J Lukaszewski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The leptotene-zygotene transition of meiosis.

Authors:  D Zickler; N Kleckner
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Nucleolus-associated telomere clustering and pairing precede meiotic chromosome synapsis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  S J Armstrong; F C Franklin; G H Jones
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus.

Authors:  J A Croft; J M Bridger; S Boyle; P Perry; P Teague; W A Bickmore
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06-14       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Homologous chromosome pairing in wheat.

Authors:  E Martínez-Pérez; P Shaw; S Reader; L Aragón-Alcaide; T Miller; G Moore
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  22 in total

1.  Control of conformation changes associated with homologue recognition during meiosis.

Authors:  Pilar Prieto; Graham Moore; Steve Reader
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Terminal regions of wheat chromosomes select their pairing partners in meiosis.

Authors:  Eduardo Corredor; Adam J Lukaszewski; Paula Pachón; Diana C Allen; Tomás Naranjo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Unexpected behavior of an inverted rye chromosome arm in wheat.

Authors:  Adam J Lukaszewski
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Identifying crossover-rich regions and their effect on meiotic homologous interactions by partitioning chromosome arms of wheat and rye.

Authors:  Nohelia T Valenzuela; Esther Perera; Tomás Naranjo
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 5.  Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis.

Authors:  Mara N Stewart; Dean S Dawson
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Interphase chromatin organisation in Arabidopsis nuclei: constraints versus randomness.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Alexandre Berr; Armin Meister
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Chromosomes associate premeiotically and in xylem vessel cells via their telomeres and centromeres in diploid rice ( Oryza sativa).

Authors:  Pilar Prieto; Ana Paula Santos; Graham Moore; Peter Shaw
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  The Arabidopsis CAP-D proteins are required for correct chromatin organisation, growth and fertility.

Authors:  Veit Schubert; Inna Lermontova; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Detailed dissection of the chromosomal region containing the Ph1 locus in wheat Triticum aestivum: with deletion mutants and expression profiling.

Authors:  Nadia Al-Kaff; Emilie Knight; Isabelle Bertin; Tracie Foote; Nicola Hart; Simon Griffiths; Graham Moore
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Quantitative high resolution mapping of HvMLH3 foci in barley pachytene nuclei reveals a strong distal bias and weak interference.

Authors:  Dylan Phillips; Joanna Wnetrzak; Candida Nibau; Abdellah Barakate; Luke Ramsay; Frank Wright; James D Higgins; Ruth M Perry; Glyn Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.