BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 15-item National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurological deficit with established reliability and validity for use in clinical research. An abridged 11-item modified NIHSS (mNIHSS) has been described that simplifies or eliminates redundant and less reliable items. We aimed to determine whether the mNIHSS could be accurately abstracted from medical records to facilitate retrospective research. METHODS: We selected 39 patient records for which NIHSS scores were formally measured. Handwritten notes from medical records were abstracted, and NIHSS item scores were estimated by 5 raters blinded to actual scores. Estimated scores were compared among raters and with actual measured scores. RESULTS: Interrater reliability for total NIHSS on admission and discharge was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.85 and 0.79, respectively. However, ICCs for 2 items (facial palsy and dysarthria) were poor (<0.40). Interrater reliability for total mNIHSS was slightly greater, with ICCs of 0.87 and 0.89 on admission and discharge, respectively. None of the 11 mNIHSS items had poor reliability, 4 were moderate (ICC, 0.40 to 0.75), and 7 were excellent (ICC >0.75). Sixty-two percent of estimated total NIHSS scores were within 2 points of actual scores and 91% were within 5 points, whereas 70% of estimated total mNIHSS scores were within 2 points and 95% were within 5 points. CONCLUSIONS: The mNIHSS can be estimated from medical records with a high degree of reliability and validity. In retrospective assessment of stroke severity, the mNIHSS performs better than the standard NIHSS and may be easier to use because it has fewer and simpler items.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 15-item National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a quantitative measure of stroke-related neurological deficit with established reliability and validity for use in clinical research. An abridged 11-item modified NIHSS (mNIHSS) has been described that simplifies or eliminates redundant and less reliable items. We aimed to determine whether the mNIHSS could be accurately abstracted from medical records to facilitate retrospective research. METHODS: We selected 39 patient records for which NIHSS scores were formally measured. Handwritten notes from medical records were abstracted, and NIHSS item scores were estimated by 5 raters blinded to actual scores. Estimated scores were compared among raters and with actual measured scores. RESULTS: Interrater reliability for total NIHSS on admission and discharge was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.85 and 0.79, respectively. However, ICCs for 2 items (facial palsy and dysarthria) were poor (<0.40). Interrater reliability for total mNIHSS was slightly greater, with ICCs of 0.87 and 0.89 on admission and discharge, respectively. None of the 11 mNIHSS items had poor reliability, 4 were moderate (ICC, 0.40 to 0.75), and 7 were excellent (ICC >0.75). Sixty-two percent of estimated total NIHSS scores were within 2 points of actual scores and 91% were within 5 points, whereas 70% of estimated total mNIHSS scores were within 2 points and 95% were within 5 points. CONCLUSIONS: The mNIHSS can be estimated from medical records with a high degree of reliability and validity. In retrospective assessment of stroke severity, the mNIHSS performs better than the standard NIHSS and may be easier to use because it has fewer and simpler items.
Authors: Cheng Chen; Pengcheng Xun; Leslie A McClure; John Brockman; Leslie MacDonald; Mary Cushman; Jianwen Cai; Lisa Kamendulis; Jason Mackey; Ka He Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Alexandra Leitão; Anabela Brito; João Pinho; José Nuno Alves; Ricardo Costa; José Manuel Amorim; Manuel Ribeiro; Inês Pinho; Carla Ferreira Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Matthew A Koenig; Romergryko G Geocadin; Megan de Grouchy; James Glasgow; Sangeetha Vimal; Lucas Restrepo; Robert J Wityk Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Wade S Smith; Jack W Tsao; Martha E Billings; S Claiborne Johnston; J Claude Hemphill; David C Bonovich; William P Dillon Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Pooja Khatri; Robert A Taylor; Vanessa Palumbo; Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Jeffrey M Katz; Julio A Chalela; Ann Geers; Joseph Haymore; Daniel M Kolansky; Scott E Kasner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Aurora Dollenberg; Sebastian Moeller; Caroline Lücke; Ruihao Wang; Alexandra P Lam; Alexandra Philipsen; Jürgen M Gschossmann; Falk Hoffmann; Helge H O Müller Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Alireza Esteghamati; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Behnam Heidari; Ali Zandieh; Vahid Eslami Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 4.003