Literature DB >> 12574064

Computer simulations of enzyme catalysis: methods, progress, and insights.

Arieh Warshel1.   

Abstract

Understanding the action of enzymes on an atomistic level is one of the important aims of modern biophysics. This review describes the state of the art in addressing this challenge by simulating enzymatic reactions. It considers different modeling methods including the empirical valence bond (EVB) and more standard molecular orbital quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) methods. The importance of proper configurational averaging of QM/MM energies is emphasized, pointing out that at present such averages are performed most effectively by the EVB method. It is clarified that all properly conducted simulation studies have identified electrostatic preorganization effects as the source of enzyme catalysis. It is argued that the ability to simulate enzymatic reactions also provides the chance to examine the importance of nonelectrostatic contributions and the validity of the corresponding proposals. In fact, simulation studies have indicated that prominent proposals such as desolvation, steric strain, near attack conformation, entropy traps, and coherent dynamics do not account for a major part of the catalytic power of enzymes. Finally, it is pointed out that although some of the issues are likely to remain controversial for some time, computer modeling approaches can provide a powerful tool for understanding enzyme catalysis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12574064     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct        ISSN: 1056-8700


  95 in total

1.  What really prevents proton transport through aquaporin? Charge self-energy versus proton wire proposals.

Authors:  Anton Burykin; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Converting conformational changes to electrostatic energy in molecular motors: The energetics of ATP synthase.

Authors:  Marek Strajbl; Avital Shurki; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A practical guide to modelling enzyme-catalysed reactions.

Authors:  Richard Lonsdale; Jeremy N Harvey; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Spontaneous proton transfer to a conserved intein residue determines on-pathway protein splicing.

Authors:  Brian Pereira; Philip T Shemella; Gil Amitai; Georges Belfort; Saroj K Nayak; Marlene Belfort
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Conformational dependence of a protein kinase phosphate transfer reaction.

Authors:  Graeme Henkelman; Montiago X LaBute; Chang-Shung Tung; P W Fenimore; Benjamin H McMahon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  QM/MM Minimum Free Energy Path: Methodology and Application to Triosephosphate Isomerase.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Zhenyu Lu; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  On the Origins of the Linear Free Energy Relationships: Exploring the Nature of the Off-Diagonal Coupling Elements in S(N)2 Reactions.

Authors:  Edina Rosta; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Does water relay play an important role in phosphoryl transfer reactions? Insights from theoretical study of a model reaction in water and tert-butanol.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Qiang Cui
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Improved pKa calculations through flexibility based sampling of a water-dominated interaction scheme.

Authors:  Jim Warwicker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.