Literature DB >> 12573175

Long-term effects of the Eclipse cigarette substitute and the nicotine inhaler in smokers not interested in quitting.

Karl Olov Fagerström1, John R Hughes, Peter W Callas.   

Abstract

This study investigated the long term use of Eclipse, a cigarette-like device that heats rather than burns tobacco, and the Nicorette oral inhaler, a nicotine replacement product, in a group of smokers not interested in quitting smoking. Subjects were recruited from a previous four-week controlled trial with the Eclipse and the inhaler (Fagerström, Hughes, Rasmussen, & Callas, 2000). Thirty eight subjects from the previous study were given the opportunity to continue to reduce their smoking for eight weeks and to choose Eclipse or the inhaler to aid reduction in cigarette smoking. If they did not like either of the two products they were allowed to smoke their own brand of cigarettes. A total of 39% percent chose to use the inhaler, 26% the Eclipse, and 34% neither. Number of cigarettes smoked per day decreased 86% with the Eclipse and 68% with the inhaler. Exhaled carbon monoxide increased 45% with Eclipse and decreased 47% with the inhaler. No differences were seen with craving for cigarettes between the products. Cigarette users showed stable values for cigarettes per day, exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and nicotine/cotinine concentrations. These results replicate and extend our prior results; i.e. both Eclipse and inhaler clearly reduced smoking of traditional cigarettes and with no loss of effect over time. For Eclipse this was accompanied by maintenance of nicotine levels but increases in CO whereas for the inhaler this was accompanied by a reduction in CO intake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12573175     DOI: 10.1080/1462220021000032771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  16 in total

Review 1.  The feasibility of smoking reduction: an update.

Authors:  John R Hughes; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  The time for tobacco industry sponsored PREP evaluation has arrived.

Authors:  T Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  New tobacco products: do smokers like them?

Authors:  R S Caraballo; L L Pederson; N Gupta
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Effectiveness of switching to very low nicotine content cigarettes plus nicotine patch versus reducing daily cigarette consumption plus nicotine patch to decrease dependence: an exploratory randomized trial.

Authors:  Elias M Klemperer; John R Hughes; Peter W Callas; Joy A Benner; Nicholas E Morley
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 5.  Measures for assessing subjective effects of potential reduced-exposure products.

Authors:  Karen Hanson; Richard O'Connor; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Postmarketing surveillance for "modified-risk" tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Answering questions about electronic cigarettes using a multidisciplinary model.

Authors:  Alison Breland; Robert L Balster; Caroline Cobb; Pebbles Fagan; Jonathan Foulds; J Randy Koch; Thokozeni Lipato; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh; Shumei Sun; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2019-04

Review 8.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Assessing consumer responses to potential reduced-exposure tobacco products: a review of tobacco industry and independent research methods.

Authors:  Vaughan W Rees; Jennifer M Kreslake; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Mark Parascandola; Peter G Shields; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.