OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the evaluation were to review the performance of the Zambia Quality Assurance Program (ZQAP) and provide recommendations to help design its next phase. DESIGN AND METHODS: Topics for evaluation were identified from a systems analysis of what an 'ideal' quality assurance (QA) program might look like. The evaluation team was made up of six experts who developed questionnaires to guide the interviews and related scoring tools. The evaluation team visited 24 health facilities in nine districts, representing all four regions of Zambia, and interviewed 140 persons, including health personnel from the public and private sectors, and non-health personnel. FINDINGS: In 5 years, senior staff built a QA structure and capacity throughout Zambia, generated enthusiasm for QA, and initiated teamwork on quality of care issues by motivated health staff. Some challenges remain: lack of integration of QA, uncoordinated standards, weak methods of standards communication, poor measurement of compliance with clinical care standards, constraints on the work of the quality improvement teams, and inconsistent support systems. RECOMMENDATIONS: The evaluation team made recommendations regarding a national QA policy, mechanisms to develop standards of care, monitoring of health providers' performance, needs of quality improvement teams, training in QA, and documentation of QA activities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its success in covering the entire country with a network of QA coaches and trainers, the capacity of the public sector to sustain QA activities at the central and district levels remains a challenge. Lessons from the Zambia experience can benefit QA programs in other developing countries.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the evaluation were to review the performance of the Zambia Quality Assurance Program (ZQAP) and provide recommendations to help design its next phase. DESIGN AND METHODS: Topics for evaluation were identified from a systems analysis of what an 'ideal' quality assurance (QA) program might look like. The evaluation team was made up of six experts who developed questionnaires to guide the interviews and related scoring tools. The evaluation team visited 24 health facilities in nine districts, representing all four regions of Zambia, and interviewed 140 persons, including health personnel from the public and private sectors, and non-health personnel. FINDINGS: In 5 years, senior staff built a QA structure and capacity throughout Zambia, generated enthusiasm for QA, and initiated teamwork on quality of care issues by motivated health staff. Some challenges remain: lack of integration of QA, uncoordinated standards, weak methods of standards communication, poor measurement of compliance with clinical care standards, constraints on the work of the quality improvement teams, and inconsistent support systems. RECOMMENDATIONS: The evaluation team made recommendations regarding a national QA policy, mechanisms to develop standards of care, monitoring of health providers' performance, needs of quality improvement teams, training in QA, and documentation of QA activities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its success in covering the entire country with a network of QA coaches and trainers, the capacity of the public sector to sustain QA activities at the central and district levels remains a challenge. Lessons from the Zambia experience can benefit QA programs in other developing countries.
Authors: Orville Solon; Kimberly Woo; Stella A Quimbo; Riti Shimkhada; Jhiedon Florentino; John W Peabody Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Emily J Cherlin; Adel A Allam; Erika L Linnander; Rex Wong; Essam El-Toukhy; Heather Sipsma; Harlan M Krumholz; Leslie A Curry; Elizabeth H Bradley Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2011-10-20 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Deborah E White; Sharon E Straus; H Tom Stelfox; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Chaim M Bell; Karen Jackson; Jill M Norris; W Ward Flemons; Michael E Moffatt; Alan J Forster Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Judith T Fullerton; Kevin D Frick; Linda A Fogarty; Joy D Fishel; Donna M Vivio Journal: J Health Popul Nutr Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Tim Colbourn; Bejoy Nambiar; Austin Bondo; Charles Makwenda; Eric Tsetekani; Agnes Makonda-Ridley; Martin Msukwa; Pierre Barker; Uma Kotagal; Cassie Williams; Ros Davies; Dale Webb; Dorothy Flatman; Sonia Lewycka; Mikey Rosato; Fannie Kachale; Charles Mwansambo; Anthony Costello Journal: Int Health Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 2.473
Authors: Daniel J Ikeda; Apollo Basenero; Joseph Murungu; Margareth Jasmin; Maureen Inimah; Bruce D Agins Journal: J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis Date: 2019-08-07