Literature DB >> 12571526

Randomized, controlled evaluation of a prototype informed consent process for HIV vaccine efficacy trials.

Anne S Coletti1, Patrick Heagerty, Amy R Sheon, Michael Gross, Beryl A Koblin, David S Metzger, George R Seage.   

Abstract

Procedures must be developed to ensure that valid informed consent is obtained from participants in HIV vaccine efficacy trials. A prototype informed consent process was evaluated among 4,892 persons at high risk for HIV infection in the HIV Network for Prevention Trials Vaccine Preparedness Study (VPS), a prospective cohort study of HIV seroincidence in eight U.S. metropolitan areas. Twenty percent of VPS participants were selected at random to undergo the prototype informed consent process at VPS month 3. Participants' knowledge of 10 key HIV vaccine trial concepts and willingness to participate in HIV vaccine efficacy trials were assessed and compared at baseline and semiannually thereafter for 18 months. Knowledge of HIV vaccine trial concepts was low at baseline. Participation in the prototype process was associated with substantial and sustained increases in knowledge (relative risks for the 10 items, 1.04-2.26), which were of similar magnitude across HIV risk groups, race/ethnicity, and educational levels. It is recommended that the prototype informed consent process be adopted for future HIV vaccine efficacy trials as well as for clinical trials in other research areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12571526     DOI: 10.1097/00126334-200302010-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  38 in total

Review 1.  A model designed to enhance informed consent: experiences from the HIV prevention trials network.

Authors:  Cynthia Woodsong; Quarraisha Abdool Karim
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Perceptions of risk in research participation among underserved minority drug users.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Slomka; Eric A Ratliff; Sheryl McCurdy; Sandra Timpson; Mark L Williams
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.164

3.  Informed consent for opt-in HIV testing via tablet kiosk: an assessment of patient comprehension and acceptability.

Authors:  Mitra K Lewis; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Charlotte A Gaydos; Stephen C Peterson; Richard E Rothman
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 1.359

4.  Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.

Authors:  Eugene I Kane; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2016-10-31

5.  Theoretical model of critical issues in informed consent in HIV vaccine trials.

Authors:  Cindi A Lewis; Stephen Dewhurst; James M McMahon; Catherine A Bunce; Michael C Keefer; Amina P Alio
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2014-05-28

6.  Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sudore; C Seth Landefeld; Brie A Williams; Deborah E Barnes; Karla Lindquist; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Stanley J Chetcuti; Colleen Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.046

8.  Patient comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: a comparison with standard information.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Mauro Moscucci; Colleen M Brennan-Martinez; Robert Levine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

9.  Giving voice to study volunteers: comparing views of mentally ill, physically ill, and healthy protocol participants on ethical aspects of clinical research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  "Teach-to-Goal" to Better Assess Informed Consent Comprehension among Incarcerated Clinical Research Participants.

Authors:  Cyrus Ahalt; Rebecca Sudore; Marielle Bolano; Lia Metzger; Anna M Darby; Brie Williams
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.