Literature DB >> 12569283

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients with clinically negative regional lymph nodes--one institution's experience.

Zbigniew I Nowecki1, Piotr Rutkowski, Anna Nasierowska-Guttmejer, Wlodzimierz Ruka.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in a large series of melanoma patients with clinically negative regional lymph nodes from one cancer centre was to analyse the reliability of the procedure, the pattern of failures during follow-up and the factors affecting the clinical outcome of patients. Between April 1995 and November 2001, 726 consecutive patients with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma underwent SLN biopsy with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. The vital blue dye technique was used in 170 patients, and the blue dye technique combined with intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy in 556 patients. The primary melanoma sites were head and neck in nine patients, the extremities in 419 patients, and the trunk in 298 patients. The median Breslow thickness was 3.0 mm. All patients were followed closely, the median follow-up time being 34 months. The sentinel node(s) were successfully identified in 96% of patients. Intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy combined with the blue dye technique improved the SLN identification rate (technical success in 97.3% of cases) compared with the blue dye technique alone (technical success in 91.6%). The rate of failed SLN procedures was significantly (P = 0.007) lower in inguinal basins (3.1%) compared with axillary basins (7.9%). SLN metastases were detected in 147 patients (20.2%). The presence of SLN metastases correlated significantly with primary tumour thickness and ulceration (P < 0.001). The false-negative SLN biopsy rate was 4.66% (27 out of 579 SLN-negative patients). All but two node-positive patients underwent complete lymphadenectomy. Lymph nodes other than SLNs were found to contain metastases in 26.9% of patients (39 out of 145). The 5 year overall survival (OS) rate was 84% for SLN-negative patients and 40% for SLN-positive patients. Five variables showed a strong, statistically significant negative independent prognostic association with OS: positive SLN status (P = 0.000001), primary melanoma thickness > 4 mm (P = 0.0009), male gender (P = 0.001), more than one lymph node involvement (P = 0.02) and lymph node extracapsular extension (P = 0.03). SLN biopsy is currently a valuable and effective diagnostic procedure for the precise staging of patients with clinically N0 cutaneous melanoma. So far SLN biopsy seems to be the only accessible method for consciously oriented detection of nodal micrometastases in melanoma that would otherwise go undetected. SLN status is the most important factor proven to distinguish high and low risk melanoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12569283     DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200302000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  11 in total

1.  Impact of Completion Lymph Node Dissection on Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma.

Authors:  David Y Lee; Briana J Lau; Kelly T Huynh; Devin C Flaherty; Ji-Hey Lee; Stacey L Stern; Steve J O'Day; Leland J Foshag; Mark B Faries
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in lymphatic drainage and sentinel node tumor burden.

Authors:  Piotr Rutkowski; Zbigniew I Nowecki; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Jadwiga Kulik; Michej Wanda; Janusz A Siedlecki; Alexander M M Eggermont; Wlodzimierz Ruka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Features of sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma may lead to re-diagnosis of the cutaneous primary: an unusual case and review of literature.

Authors:  Rathi Ramakrishnan; Richard Young; Barry Powell; M G Cook
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Prognosis of sentinel node staged patients with primary cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Otmar Elsaesser; Ulrike Leiter; Petra G Buettner; Thomas K Eigentler; Friedegund Meier; Benjamin Weide; Gisela Metzler; Helmut Breuninger; Claus Garbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevention of an additional surgery for regional lymphadenectomy in melanoma: rapid intraoperative immunostaining of sentinel lymph node imprint smears.

Authors:  Vinod B Shidham; Richard Komorowski; Marcelle Neuberg; Alonzo Walker; Bruce H Campbell; Chung-Che Chang; William W Dzwierzynski
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Optimization of an immunostaining protocol for the rapid intraoperative evaluation of melanoma sentinel lymph node imprint smears with the 'MCW melanoma cocktail'

Authors:  Vinod B Shidham; Richard Komorowski; Virgilia Macias; Sushma Kaul; Glen Dawson; William W Dzwierzynski
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Sentinel node status in melanoma patients is not predictive for overall survival upon multivariate analysis.

Authors:  F Roka; H Kittler; P Cauzig; C Hoeller; G Hinterhuber; K Wolff; H Pehamberger; E Diem
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Prediction of sentinel node status and clinical outcome in a melanoma centre.

Authors:  Vera Teixeira; Ricardo Vieira; Inês Coutinho; Rita Cabral; David Serra; Maria José Julião; Maria Manuel Brites; Anabela Albuquerque; João Pedroso de Lima; Américo Figueiredo
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2013-12-25

9.  Confirmation of sentinel lymph node identity by analysis of fine-needle biopsy samples using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alison Beavis; Michael Dawson; Philip Doble; Richard A Scolyer; Roger Bourne; Ling-Xi L Li; Rajmohan Murali; Jonathan R Stretch; Cynthia L Lean; Roger F Uren; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Inflammation and tumor microenvironment in lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Xuesong Wu; Tomonori Takekoshi; Ashley Sullivan; Sam T Hwang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.