Literature DB >> 12566882

Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in goldmann kinetic perimetry.

Susanne Niederhauser1, Daniel S Mojon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Often in young patients the question arises if a disease state has contracted their peripheral boundary of the visual field. Since the 'hill of vision' is steeper in the periphery, kinetic perimetry is more sensitive in detecting peripheral visual field abnormalities than static perimetry. In order to be able with kinetic perimetry to detect mild peripheral visual field constrictions, we determined the normal position of 4 isopters in the peripheral visual field. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Intraindividual sensitivity variations of the isopters in the peripheral visual field were determined in 3 normal subjects by one perimetrist. Then, in 22 subjects (19-42 years old) the position of the isopters V4e, III4e, I4e and I3e has been determined by one perimetrist. Visual fields were registered using a Goldmann kinetic perimeter.
RESULTS: The intraindividual sensitivity variations (measured as 1 standard deviation) for the isopter V4e was 0.98 degrees and for the isopter I4e 1.13 degrees. To visualize the normal isopter positions in the peripheral visual field, the average positions +/- 2 standard deviations were plotted for the isopters V4e, III4e, I4e and I3e.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we determined the normal position of 4 isopters frequently used to plot the peripheral visual field. The plots have been printed in a scale of 1:4 in order to facilitate its use. Photocopying the figures on transparencies by scaling them with a factor 4 will allow to superpose the transparencies on individual Goldmann kinetic visual fields in order to easily determine whether the individual isopters are inside or outside the normal range. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12566882     DOI: 10.1159/000067554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologica        ISSN: 0030-3755            Impact factor:   3.250


  12 in total

1.  Visual field loss in children with craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Alki Liasis; Bronwen Walters; Dorothy Thompson; Kate Smith; Richard Hayward; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Perception of differences in naturalistic dynamic scenes, and a V1-based model.

Authors:  Michelle P S To; Iain D Gilchrist; David J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Individual differences in visual field shape modulate the effects of attention on the lower visual field advantage in crowding.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Severe, persistent visual impairment associated with occipital calcification and coeliac disease.

Authors:  Rebecca S Millington; Merle James-Galton; John L Barbur; Gordon T Plant; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Normal Values for the Full Visual Field, Corrected for Age- and Reaction Time, Using Semiautomated Kinetic Testing on the Octopus 900 Perimeter.

Authors:  Julia Grobbel; Janko Dietzsch; Chris A Johnson; Reinhard Vonthein; Katarina Stingl; Richard G Weleber; Ulrich Schiefer
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Eye-Tracking Reveals that the Strength of the Vertical-Horizontal Illusion Increases as the Retinal Image Becomes More Stable with Fixation.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Hayden J Peel; Oriane Landry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Why do patients with Parkinson's disease fall? A cross-sectional analysis of possible causes of falls.

Authors:  Anette Schrag; Mahbuba Choudhury; Diego Kaski; David A Gallagher
Journal:  NPJ Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2015-06-11

8.  Assessing the correlation between mutant rhodopsin stability and the severity of retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Richard McKeone; Matthew Wikstrom; Christina Kiel; P Elizabeth Rakoczy
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Contralesional Trunk Rotation Dissociates Real vs. Pseudo-Visual Field Defects due to Visual Neglect in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Thomas Nyffeler; Rebecca E Paladini; Simone Hopfner; Oliver Job; Tobias Nef; Tobias Pflugshaupt; Tim Vanbellingen; Stephan Bohlhalter; René M Müri; Georg Kerkhoff; Dario Cazzoli
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Pattern Recognition Analysis Reveals Unique Contrast Sensitivity Isocontours Using Static Perimetry Thresholds Across the Visual Field.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Barbara Zangerl; Agnes Yiu Jeung Choi; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.