PURPOSE: Often in young patients the question arises if a disease state has contracted their peripheral boundary of the visual field. Since the 'hill of vision' is steeper in the periphery, kinetic perimetry is more sensitive in detecting peripheral visual field abnormalities than static perimetry. In order to be able with kinetic perimetry to detect mild peripheral visual field constrictions, we determined the normal position of 4 isopters in the peripheral visual field. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Intraindividual sensitivity variations of the isopters in the peripheral visual field were determined in 3 normal subjects by one perimetrist. Then, in 22 subjects (19-42 years old) the position of the isopters V4e, III4e, I4e and I3e has been determined by one perimetrist. Visual fields were registered using a Goldmann kinetic perimeter. RESULTS: The intraindividual sensitivity variations (measured as 1 standard deviation) for the isopter V4e was 0.98 degrees and for the isopter I4e 1.13 degrees. To visualize the normal isopter positions in the peripheral visual field, the average positions +/- 2 standard deviations were plotted for the isopters V4e, III4e, I4e and I3e. CONCLUSION: In this study, we determined the normal position of 4 isopters frequently used to plot the peripheral visual field. The plots have been printed in a scale of 1:4 in order to facilitate its use. Photocopying the figures on transparencies by scaling them with a factor 4 will allow to superpose the transparencies on individual Goldmann kinetic visual fields in order to easily determine whether the individual isopters are inside or outside the normal range. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
PURPOSE: Often in young patients the question arises if a disease state has contracted their peripheral boundary of the visual field. Since the 'hill of vision' is steeper in the periphery, kinetic perimetry is more sensitive in detecting peripheral visual field abnormalities than static perimetry. In order to be able with kinetic perimetry to detect mild peripheral visual field constrictions, we determined the normal position of 4 isopters in the peripheral visual field. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Intraindividual sensitivity variations of the isopters in the peripheral visual field were determined in 3 normal subjects by one perimetrist. Then, in 22 subjects (19-42 years old) the position of the isopters V4e, III4e, I4e and I3e has been determined by one perimetrist. Visual fields were registered using a Goldmann kinetic perimeter. RESULTS: The intraindividual sensitivity variations (measured as 1 standard deviation) for the isopter V4e was 0.98 degrees and for the isopter I4e 1.13 degrees. To visualize the normal isopter positions in the peripheral visual field, the average positions +/- 2 standard deviations were plotted for the isopters V4e, III4e, I4e and I3e. CONCLUSION: In this study, we determined the normal position of 4 isopters frequently used to plot the peripheral visual field. The plots have been printed in a scale of 1:4 in order to facilitate its use. Photocopying the figures on transparencies by scaling them with a factor 4 will allow to superpose the transparencies on individual Goldmann kinetic visual fields in order to easily determine whether the individual isopters are inside or outside the normal range. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
Authors: Alki Liasis; Bronwen Walters; Dorothy Thompson; Kate Smith; Richard Hayward; Ken K Nischal Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Julia Grobbel; Janko Dietzsch; Chris A Johnson; Reinhard Vonthein; Katarina Stingl; Richard G Weleber; Ulrich Schiefer Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Thomas Nyffeler; Rebecca E Paladini; Simone Hopfner; Oliver Job; Tobias Nef; Tobias Pflugshaupt; Tim Vanbellingen; Stephan Bohlhalter; René M Müri; Georg Kerkhoff; Dario Cazzoli Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Lisa Nivison-Smith; Barbara Zangerl; Agnes Yiu Jeung Choi; Bryan W Jones; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Robert E Marc; Michael Kalloniatis Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 4.799