Literature DB >> 12564748

On wildebeests and humans: the preferential detection of negative stimuli.

Ap Dijksterhuis1, Henk Aarts.   

Abstract

On the basis of a functional perspective, we hypothesized that negative stimuli are detected faster than positive stimuli. In Experiment 1, participants were subliminally presented with positive and negative words or with no words at all. After each presentation, participants were asked whether they had seen a word. They detected negative words more accurately than positive words. In Experiment 2, participants were subliminally presented with negative or positive words. After each presentation, they were asked whether the presented word was positive or negative. Negative words were correctly categorized more often than positive words. Experiment 3 showed that although participants correctly categorized negative words more often than positive words. they could not guess the meaning of the words better than would be expected by chance. The results are discussed against the background of recent findings on basic affective processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12564748     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  36 in total

1.  Nonconscious semantic processing of emotional words modulates conscious access.

Authors:  Raphaël Gaillard; Antoine Del Cul; Lionel Naccache; Fabien Vinckier; Laurent Cohen; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Attention and the processing of emotional words: dissociating effects of arousal.

Authors:  Jennifer M Aquino; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

3.  Capturing and holding attention: the impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Karen M Arnell; Craig A Mansfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

4.  Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing.

Authors:  Annekathrin Schacht; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Obesity prevention at the point of purchase.

Authors:  D A Cohen; L I Lesser
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 9.213

6.  Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad?

Authors:  Angela M Griffin; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Soc Cogn       Date:  2006-04

7.  Effects of valence and divided attention on cognitive reappraisal processes.

Authors:  John A Morris; Christina M Leclerc; Elizabeth A Kensinger
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Bad things come easier to the mind but harder to the body: Evidence from brain oscillations.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner; Philipp Spachtholz; Bernhard Pastötter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 9.  Affect and Decision Making: Insights and Predictions from Computational Models.

Authors:  Ian D Roberts; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The emotional blink: adult age differences in visual attention to emotional information.

Authors:  Linda K Langley; Paul D Rokke; Atiana C Stark; Alyson L Saville; Jaryn L Allen; Angela G Bagne
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.