Literature DB >> 27383376

Bad things come easier to the mind but harder to the body: Evidence from brain oscillations.

Christof Kuhbandner1, Philipp Spachtholz2, Bernhard Pastötter2.   

Abstract

An intriguing finding of research on emotional processing is a discrepancy between perception and behavior. Perceptually, a robust finding is that negative stimuli are processed faster and more efficiently than positive stimuli. Behaviorally, a similarly robust finding is that response times are slower for negative than for positive stimuli. We proposed and tested a novel account to explain this still unexplained discrepancy, on the basis of the assumption that negative valence narrows perceptual processes to the benefit of speeded perception, but broadens motor processes at the cost of slowed responding. Participants performed a valence judgment task in which they responded with their left or right hand to negative and positive stimuli that were presented on the left or right, and we measured the activation of relevant/deactivation of irrelevant perceptual and motor processes, as revealed by the lateralization of electroencephalographic brain oscillations. Stimulus-related lateralization of alpha activity (8-12 Hz) over perceptual areas was increased for negative stimuli, indicating more efficient perceptual processing. By contrast, response-related lateralization of beta activity (20-25 Hz) over motor areas was decreased for negative stimuli, indicating less efficient response activation. Consistent with our predictions, more detailed analyses showed that both lateralization effects were caused by dynamics at the level of inhibiting irrelevant processes. For negative as compared to positive stimuli, the inhibition of irrelevant perceptual processes was increased, but the inhibition of irrelevant motor processes was decreased. These findings indicate that the discrepancy between perception and behavior in emotional processing may stem from asymmetrical effects of emotional valence on the breadth of cortical activations in perceptual and motor networks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Emotion; Motor behavior; Perception; Response speed

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27383376     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0429-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  46 in total

Review 1.  Artifact correction of the ongoing EEG using spatial filters based on artifact and brain signal topographies.

Authors:  Nicole Ille; Patrick Berg; Michael Scherg
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates visual detection performance in humans.

Authors:  Tolgay Ergenoglu; Tamer Demiralp; Zubeyir Bayraktaroglu; Mehmet Ergen; Huseyin Beydagi; Yagiz Uresin
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-08

3.  Movement-related EEG indices of preparation in task switching and motor control.

Authors:  Ritske de Jong; Thomas E Gladwin; Bernard M 't Hart
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Buzzwords: early cortical responses to emotional words during reading.

Authors:  Johanna Kissler; Cornelia Herbert; Peter Peyk; Markus Junghofer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-06

Review 5.  Negative brain: an integrative review on the neural processes activated by unpleasant stimuli.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; Jacobo Albert; Sara López-Martín; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Basic hue-meaning associations.

Authors:  Arlen C Moller; Andrew J Elliot; Markus A Maier
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-12

7.  Freeze or flee? Negative stimuli elicit selective responding.

Authors:  Zachary Estes; Michelle Verges
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-04-22

8.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words.

Authors:  Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta; David P Vinson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-07-09

Review 9.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; L Anllo-Vento
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Switching from approach to withdrawal is easier than vice versa.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner; Carina M Vogel; Stephanie Lichtenfeld
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.