Literature DB >> 12563194

A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Jon S Matsumura1, David C Brewster, Michel S Makaroun, David C Naftel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel endovascular graft for elective treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The device is a modular bifurcated system with nitinol/expanded polytetrafluoroethylene components and a smaller profile than currently approved devices.
METHODS: In a multicenter, concurrent controlled phase II trial, 334 patients underwent treatment with the Excluder bifurcated endoprosthesis (test, n = 235; W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) or with standard open repair (control, n = 99). Preoperative characteristics, perioperative variables, follow-up clinical evaluations, and radiographic examination results through the first 2 years were analyzed with univariable and multivariable statistics.
RESULTS: Patients in the test group had less blood loss (310 +/- 19 mL versus 1590 +/- 124 mL; P <.0001), fewer homologous transfusions (6% versus 32%; P <.0001), and shorter lengths of stay (2.0 +/- 0.1 days versus 9.8 +/- 1.4 days; P <.0001). Early major adverse events were markedly reduced in the test group (14% versus 57%; P <.0001), and this difference persisted at 2 years. No difference was seen in survival rate (P =.13). In the first 2 years, no deployment failure, early conversion, or aneurysm rupture occurred. At the 2-year timepoint, core laboratory read trunk migration in 1%, limb migration in 1%, limb narrowing in 1%, endoleak in 20%, and aneurysm growth in 14%. One wire discontinuity (0.6%) was identified in a discharge film. A 7% annual reintervention rate was seen in the test group in the first 2 years.
SUMMARY: The test device is a safe and effective treatment compared with open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The most striking benefits are reduced blood loss, fewer complications, and faster recovery. Two-year survival rate was similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12563194     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  34 in total

1.  Cost disparity between open repair and endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a single-institute experience in Japan.

Authors:  Hirofumi Morimae; Takashi Maekawa; Hiroaki Tamai; Noriko Takahashi; Tsutomu Ihara; Akihiko Hori; Hiroshi Narita; Hiroshi Banno; Masayoshi Kobayashi; Kiyohito Yamamoto; Kimihiro Komori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Successful endovascular management of an aortic rupture following stent placement for severe atherosclerotic stenosis: A case report.

Authors:  Thomas L Chung; Dipankar Mukherjee
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2007

3.  Real-time magnetic resonance-guided endovascular repair of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm in swine.

Authors:  Venkatesh K Raman; Parag V Karmarkar; Michael A Guttman; Alexander J Dick; Dana C Peters; Cengizhan Ozturk; Breno S S Pessanha; Richard B Thompson; Amish N Raval; Ranil DeSilva; Ronnier J Aviles; Ergin Atalar; Elliot R McVeigh; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Complications of endovascular aneurysm repair of the thoracic and abdominal aorta: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Dania Daye; T Gregory Walker
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-04

5.  Endovascular aneurysm repair for an abdominal aortic aneurysm and a left ruptured common iliac artery aneurysm in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma: report of a case.

Authors:  Ryoichi Kyuragi; Takuya Matsumoto; Jun Okadome; Eisuke Kawakubo; Kenichi Homma; Kazuomi Iwasa; Atsushi Guntani; Jin Okazaki; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Preliminary 3D computational analysis of the relationship between aortic displacement force and direction of endograft movement.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Victoria Yeh; Allen J Chiou; Madhu L Gorrepati; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Causes of late mortality after endovascular and open surgical repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Dale Tavris; F Lee Lucas; Thomas Gross; Elliott S Fisher; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Clinical significance of endoleaks characterized by computed tomography during aortography performed immediately after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: prediction of persistent endoleak.

Authors:  Motoki Nakai; Hirotatsu Sato; Morio Sato; Yuko Tanba; Yasutaka Noda; Akira Ikoma; Hiroki Sanda; Kohei Nakata; Hiroki Minamiguchi; Nobuyuki Kawai; Tetsuo Sonomura; Kazushi Kishi; Yosiharu Nishimura; Yoshitaka Okamura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Simultaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation and endovascular aneurysm repair in a patient with very severe aortic stenosis with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Yu Sato; Yu Horiuchi; Kazuyuki Yahagi; Taishi Okuno; Takayoshi Kusuhara; Motoi Yokozuka; Sumio Miura; Takeshi Taketani; Kengo Tanabe
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  Occlusion of the common and internal iliac arteries for aortoiliac aneurysm repair: experience with the Amplatzer vascular plug.

Authors:  S Marlene Grenon; Joel Gagnon; York Hsiang; Ravi Sidhu; David Taylor; Jason Clement; Jerry Chen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.