Literature DB >> 12562649

Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer.

E Baldini1, G Gardin, P G Giannessi, G Evangelista, M Roncella, T Prochilo, P Collecchi, R Rosso, R Lionetto, P Bruzzi, F Mosca, P F Conte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a dose-dense primary chemotherapy on pathological response rate (pCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with combined modality therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IIIA/IIIB patients received three courses of induction chemotherapy (ICT) with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) followed by local therapy (total mastectomy or segmental mastectomy with axillary nodes dissection) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with three courses of CEF alternated with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Patients were randomized to receive ICT and ACT every 3 weeks (arm A, 'standard treatment') or every 2 weeks with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support (arm B, 'dose-dense treatment'). In both arms radiotherapy was administered after the end of chemotherapy (in selected cases) and patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years.
RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were randomized (77 arm A and 73 arm B) and demographics were well balanced between the two arms. Compliance to treatment was excellent: 95% and 93% of patients in arms A and B, respectively, completed the treatment program with no modification or delay. Median duration of treatment (ICT+local+ACT) was 183 days (range 0-265) in arm A and 139 days (0-226) in arm B. The average relative dose intensity (ARDI) of chemotherapy was 1.3 with a 30% increase in the dose intensity in arm B in comparison with arm A. No difference in clinical [62%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 49% to 73.2%] and pathological response rates to ICT was observed between the two arms. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-96 months); median disease-free survivals were 4.8 years in arm A and 4.5 years in arm B. Median overall survival was 7.8 years in standard therapy: this figure has not yet been reached in the dose-dense treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: In LABC a dose-dense regimen, while allowing a 30% increase in the dose intensity of chemotherapy, did not provide significant improvement in pathological response rates. However, accelerated chemotherapy reduced the duration of the combined-modality program (6.1 versus 4.6 months) with no additional toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12562649     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  14 in total

1.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Uptake and economic impact of first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use during adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Elizabeth T Wilde; Jason D Wright; Donna L Buono; Kevin Kalinsky; Jennifer L Malin; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant Dose-Dense and Dose-Intensified Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer - Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mattea Reinisch; Beyhan Ataseven; Sherko Kümmel
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Inflammatory breast cancer-comparing the effectivity of preoperative docetaxel-epirubicine protocol to conventional antracycline-containing chemotherapy to achieve clinical benefit and complete pathological response.

Authors:  Zsolt Horváth; László Torday; Erika Hitre; Erna Ganofszky; Eva Juhos; Ferenc Czeglédi; László Urbán; Csaba Polgár; István Láng; Sándor Eckhardt; Miklós Kásler
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for "triple negative" breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook.

Authors:  Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  The curability of breast cancer and the treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Pier Franco Conte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-24       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  The actual scenario of neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer in developing country: a report of 80 cases of breast cancer from a tertiary cancer center in India.

Authors:  Umesh Das; K C Lakshmaiah; K Govind Babu; T M Suresh; D Lokanatha; Linu Jacob; Suresh Babu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Dose-dense chemotherapy in nonmetastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Luisa Bonilla; Irit Ben-Aharon; Liat Vidal; Anat Gafter-Gvili; Leonard Leibovici; Salomon M Stemmer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Phase II multicentre randomised study of docetaxel plus epirubicin vs 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J Bonneterre; V Dieras; M Tubiana-Hulin; P Bougnoux; M-E Bonneterre; T Delozier; F Mayer; S Culine; N Dohoulou; B Bendahmane
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.