Literature DB >> 12560938

Granulocyte transfusions from G-CSF-stimulated donors for the treatment of severe infections in neutropenic pediatric patients with onco-hematological diseases.

Simone Cesaro1, Pierangelo Chinello, Giustina De Silvestro, Piero Marson, Giorgio Picco, Stefania Varotto, Silvia Pittalis, Luigi Zanesco.   

Abstract

From March 1994 to January 2001, 15 courses of granulocyte transfusion (GTX) were administered to 13 neutropenic patients (6 male and 7 female patients; median age 7 years, range 3 months to 14 years) affected by: acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 6 cases, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in 5, very severe aplastic anemia in 1, and familial erythrophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (FEL) in 1. Infections were classified as microbiologically defined and clinically defined infections in 8 and 7 episodes, respectively. Before the GTX transfusions, broad-spectrum antibacterial and antifungal therapy had been administered for a median of 12 (range 5-28) and 8 days (range 2-50), respectively, with no improvement. G-CSF was administered prior to GTX in 9 episodes of infection, with a median of 9 days of treatment (range 4-30). Leukapheresis was obtained from 15 related donors (father, 10; mother, 3; sister, 1; aunt, 1) after s.c. stimulation with G-CSF, 300 micro g daily, starting from day -3 (where day 0 was the day of the first granulocyte collection) and continuing throughout the period of GTX treatment. The donors' median white blood cell (WBC) count at leukapheresis was 31.6 x 10(9)/l (range 12-56), and the median yield was 31.39 x 10(9) WBC (range 2.96-64.73 x 10(9)), with a proportion of PMN of 90-95%. Overall, 70 GTX were administered, with a median of 4 GTX per episode of infection (range 2-11). The combination of GTX with antimicrobial therapy led to complete or partial recovery in 6 and in 3 of 15 episodes (60%), respectively. Priming of the donor with G-CSF was well tolerated, the most common side-effects being bone pain, malaise and paresthesia. All donors are alive and well after a median of 4.5 years (range 0.8-7.7) from donation. We conclude that GTX is potentially useful when the severity of the infection and the host's immunodeficiency make any other antimicrobial treatment ineffectual. Long-term safety data on the stimulation of donors with G-CSF have been reassuring to date. Further controlled studies are needed to assess the exact role of GTX in the outcome of neutropenic patients with severe infection and any criteria for patient selection and the timing of GTX administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12560938     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-002-0394-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  12 in total

1.  Does granulocyte transfusion play a role in the multidisciplinary treatment of invasive mycosis?

Authors:  Simone Cesaro; Piero Marson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Use of healthy-donor granulocyte transfusions to treat infections in neutropenic patients with myeloid or lymphoid neoplasms: experience in 74 patients treated with 373 granulocyte transfusions.

Authors:  Amar Safdar; Gilhen Rodriguez; Jorge Zuniga; Fadi Al Akhrass; Anupam Pande
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.195

3.  Granulocyte Transfusion Therapy in Childhood.

Authors:  Elif Aktekin; Ali Bay; Mehmet Yılmaz
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 4.  Neuroprotection through G-CSF: recent advances and future viewpoints.

Authors:  Vikrant Rahi; Sumit Jamwal; Puneet Kumar
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.024

5.  Granulocyte transfusions in severe aplastic anemia: an eleven-year experience.

Authors:  Karen Quillen; Edward Wong; Phillip Scheinberg; Neal S Young; Thomas J Walsh; Colin O Wu; Susan F Leitman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Polycythemia in an infant secondary to granulocyte transfusions.

Authors:  Olufolake Adisa; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Courtney K Hopkins; Howard M Katzenstein; Cassandra D Josephson
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 7.  Granulocyte transfusions in the management of invasive fungal infections.

Authors:  Kamille A West; Juan Gea-Banacloche; David Stroncek; Sameer S Kadri
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  Granulocyte transfusions for neonates with confirmed or suspected sepsis and neutropenia.

Authors:  Mohan Pammi; Peter Brocklehurst
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

9.  The effect of repeated stimulated granulocyte donations on hematopoietic indexes in donors: a 24-year donor center experience.

Authors:  James Szymanski; James Troendle; Susan Leitman; Hong Hong; Yu Ying Yau; Cathy Cantilena
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a very high risk group of patients with the support of granulocyte transfusion.

Authors:  Idil Yenicesu; Gülsan Sucak; Günter Dilsiz; Sahika Zeynep Akı; Zeynep Arzu Yeğin
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 0.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.