Literature DB >> 12558297

The influence of flight speed on the ranging performance of bats using frequency modulated echolocation pulses.

Arjan M Boonman1, Stuart Parsons, Gareth Jones.   

Abstract

Many species of bat use ultrasonic frequency modulated (FM) pulses to measure the distance to objects by timing the emission and reception of each pulse. Echolocation is mainly used in flight. Since the flight speed of bats often exceeds 1% of the speed of sound, Doppler effects will lead to compression of the time between emission and reception as well as an elevation of the echo frequencies, resulting in a distortion of the perceived range. This paper describes the consequences of these Doppler effects on the ranging performance of bats using different pulse designs. The consequences of Doppler effects on ranging performance described in this paper assume bats to have a very accurate ranging resolution, which is feasible with a filterbank receiver. By modeling two receiver types, it was first established that the effects of Doppler compression are virtually independent of the receiver type. Then, used a cross-correlation model was used to investigate the effect of flight speed on Doppler tolerance and range-Doppler coupling separately. This paper further shows how pulse duration, bandwidth, function type, and harmonics influence Doppler tolerance and range-Doppler coupling. The influence of each signal parameter is illustrated using calls of several bat species. It is argued that range-Doppler coupling is a significant source of error in bat echolocation, and various strategies bats could employ to deal with this problem, including the use of range rate information are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12558297     DOI: 10.1121/1.1528175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

Review 1.  Complex echo classification by echo-locating bats: a review.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias O Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Frequency modulation patterns in the echolocation signals of two vespertilionid bats.

Authors:  Arjan Boonman; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Echolocation behaviour of Megaderma lyra during typical orientation situations and while hunting aerial prey: a field study.

Authors:  Sabine Schmidt; Wipula Yapa; Jan-Eric Grunwald
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Click-based echolocation in bats: not so primitive after all.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Maya Geva-Sagiv; Nachum Ulanovsky
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; M I Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Evolution of the heteroharmonic strategy for target-range computation in the echolocation of Mormoopidae.

Authors:  Emanuel C Mora; Silvio Macías; Julio Hechavarría; Marianne Vater; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Recording animal vocalizations from a UAV: bat echolocation during roost re-entry.

Authors:  Laura N Kloepper; Morgan Kinniry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.