Literature DB >> 12556657

Benefits of antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy and blood pressure reduction in outcome trials.

Ji-Guang Wang1, Jan A Staessen.   

Abstract

In a quantitative overview of published trials, we investigated whether pharmacologic properties of antihypertensive drugs, as opposed to reduction in blood pressure, explain cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive or high-risk patients. We used meta-regression to investigate the association between the odds ratios of outcome (experimental vs. reference treatment) and the corresponding blood pressure differences between study groups. Thus, we correlated odds ratios with between-group differences in systolic pressure. We then compared odds ratios of benefit observed in recent trials with those predicted by meta-regression on the basis of the differences in systolic pressure between randomized groups. Among nine actively-controlled trials in hypertension, significant differences in systolic pressure (follow-up minus baseline) between randomized groups (experimental minus reference) were observed in the ALLHAT, CAPPP, MIDAS, and NORDIL trials. Furthermore, the differences in achieved systolic and/or diastolic pressure between study groups were also significant in the hypertension trials and studies in high-risk patients, which involved untreated control patients. The differences between the observed odds ratios and those predicted by meta-regression did not reach statistical significance except for NORDIL and the single-drug therapy subgroup of the PROGRESS trial. In NORDIL, the risk of stroke was lower on diltiazem than on the older drug classes despite a 3.1 mm Hg higher systolic pressure on the calcium channel blocker. In PROGRESS, perindopril alone reduced blood pressure by 5/3 mm Hg, but did not affect the incidence of all cardiovascular events or the recurrence of stroke. In conclusion, the finding that in the reviewed trials blood pressure reduction largely accounted for outcome emphasizes the desirability of tight blood pressure control. The hypothesis that blood pressure-lowering medications might influence cardiovascular prognosis over and beyond their antihypertensive effect remains to a large extent unproved. Copyright 2003 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12556657      PMCID: PMC8101815          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01307.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  65 in total

1.  Update on the systolic hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial. The Syst-Eur Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; L Thijs; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; R Fagard
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Long-term effects of cholesterol lowering and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on coronary atherosclerosis: The Simvastatin/Enalapril Coronary Atherosclerosis Trial (SCAT).

Authors:  K K Teo; J R Burton; C E Buller; S Plante; D Catellier; W Tymchak; V Dzavik; D Taylor; S Yokoyama; T J Montague
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly (STONE).

Authors:  L Gong; W Zhang; Y Zhu; J Zhu; D Kong; V Pagé; P Ghadirian; J LeLorier; P Hamet
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Reactive oxygen species, metalloproteinases, and plaque stability.

Authors:  M J Davies
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-06-23       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension. II. Results in patients with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1970-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Effects of treatment in hypertension. Results of a controlled study.

Authors:  F W Wolff; R D Lindeman
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1966-03

7.  An international trial of antihypertensive therapy in elderly patients. Objectives, protocol and organization. European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly (EWPHE).

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1985-06

8.  Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).

Authors:  M J Brown; C R Palmer; A Castaigne; P W de Leeuw; G Mancia; T Rosenthal; L M Ruilope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results. Medical Research Council Working Party.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-13

10.  The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Report by the Management Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-06-14       Impact factor: 202.731

View more
  8 in total

1.  Apparent treatment-resistant hypertension and risk for stroke, coronary heart disease, and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Marguerite R Irvin; John N Booth; Daichi Shimbo; Daniel T Lackland; Suzanne Oparil; George Howard; Monika M Safford; Paul Muntner; David A Calhoun
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-03-15

2.  Changes in the atherogenic risk factor profile according to degree of weight loss.

Authors:  T Reinehr; W Andler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Safety of telmisartan in patients with arterial hypertension : an open-label observational study.

Authors:  Martin C Michel; Herbert Bohner; Jürgen Köster; Rafael Schäfers; Uwe Heemann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Management of Hypertension among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Oladipupo Olafiranye; Ferdinand Zizi; Perry Brimah; Girardin Jean-Louis; Amgad N Makaryus; Samy McFarlane; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 5.  What is an appropriate blood pressure goal for the elderly: review of recent studies and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Matthew G Denker; Debbie L Cohen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 6.  Hypertension and the elderly: more than just blood pressure control.

Authors:  Lawrence Baruch
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and meta-physics.

Authors:  John B Kostis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Hypertension management in the high cardiovascular risk population.

Authors:  Ilir Maraj; John N Makaryus; Anthony Ashkar; Samy I McFarlane; Amgad N Makaryus
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.420

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.