Literature DB >> 12556342

The radiation hypersensitivity of cells at mitosis.

C C Stobbe1, S J Park, J D Chapman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mitotic cells are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation, exhibiting single-hit inactivation coefficients near to those of repair deficient cell lines and lymphocytes. To elucidate possible mechanisms for this hypersensitivity, the kinetics of oxygen radiosensitization, the proportion of indirect effect by OH radicals and the kinetics of radiation-induced DNA strand breakage in the chromatin of mitotic cells were investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synchronized populations of >90% mitotic HT-29 cells were obtained by the mitotic shake-off method. Cells were irradiated at < or =4 degrees C with (137)Cs gamma-rays. Cellular oxygen concentration was varied by gassing cell suspensions prior to and during irradiation with mixtures of pure N(2) that contained 5% CO(2) and measured quantities of O(2). The indirect effect of OH radicals was investigated with the radical scavenger, DMSO. DNA strand breakage was measured by the comet assay.
RESULTS: Mitotic HT-29 cell inactivation is well described by a single-hit inactivation coefficient (alpha) of 1.14 +/- 0.06 Gy(-1). The oxygen enhancement ratio of mitotic cells (at 10% survival) was found to be approximately 2.0, significantly lower than the value of 2.8 measured for interphase (asynchronous) cells. More than 60% of mitotic cell killing was eliminated when the media contained 2 M DMSO, indicating that indirect effect is as important in the killing of mitotic cells as it is for interphase cells. The chromatin in mitotic cells was found to be ~2.8 times more sensitive to radiation-induced DNA single-strand breakage than the chromatin of interphase cells.
CONCLUSIONS: The alpha-inactivation coefficient of mitotic HT-29 cells was ~30 times larger than that of interphase cells. Mitotic cell chromatin appears to contain intrinsic DNA breaks that are not lethal. In addition, chromatin in mitotic cells was found to be more susceptible to radiation-induced DNA strand-breakage than the dispersed chromatin of interphase cells. How the enhanced production of these simple DNA lesions (that are usually reparable) translates into the lethal (non-reparable) events associated with alpha-inactivation is not known. The compaction/dispersion status of DNA throughout the cell cycle appears to be an important factor for determining intrinsic cell radiosensitivity and might be manipulated for radiotherapeutic advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12556342     DOI: 10.1080/09553000210166570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 2.  Neurocognitive Outcomes and Interventions in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Authors:  Kevin R Krull; Kristina K Hardy; Lisa S Kahalley; Ilse Schuitema; Shelli R Kesler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Give me a break, but not in mitosis: the mitotic DNA damage response marks DNA double-strand breaks with early signaling events.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 5.  Aging in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Implications for Future Care.

Authors:  Ilse Schuitema; Tyler Alexander; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull; Kim Edelstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 6.  Bringing the heavy: carbon ion therapy in the radiobiological and clinical context.

Authors:  Cody D Schlaff; Andra Krauze; Arnaud Belard; John J O'Connell; Kevin A Camphausen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  KPU-300, a Novel Benzophenone-Diketopiperazine-Type Anti-Microtubule Agent with a 2-Pyridyl Structure, Is a Potent Radiosensitizer That Synchronizes the Cell Cycle in Early M Phase.

Authors:  Kohei Okuyama; Atsushi Kaida; Yoshiki Hayashi; Yoshio Hayashi; Kiyoshi Harada; Masahiko Miura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A multistep genomic screen identifies new genes required for repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jennifer Summers McKinney; Sunaina Sethi; Jennifer DeMars Tripp; Thuy N Nguyen; Brian A Sanderson; James W Westmoreland; Michael A Resnick; L Kevin Lewis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Concurrent versus sequential sorafenib therapy in combination with radiation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Aaron T Wild; Nishant Gandhi; Sivarajan T Chettiar; Khaled Aziz; Rajendra P Gajula; Russell D Williams; Rachit Kumar; Kekoa Taparra; Jing Zeng; Jessica A Cades; Esteban Velarde; Siddharth Menon; Jean F Geschwind; David Cosgrove; Timothy M Pawlik; Anirban Maitra; John Wong; Russell K Hales; Michael S Torbenson; Joseph M Herman; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Double-strand break repair-adox: Restoration of suppressed double-strand break repair during mitosis induces genomic instability.

Authors:  Masahiro Terasawa; Akira Shinohara; Miki Shinohara
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.