Literature DB >> 12554433

Genetic toxicity of naphthalene: a review.

Ceinwen A Schreiner1.   

Abstract

Results of five previously unpublished studies of the genotoxicity of naphthalene are presented and extensively discussed in relation to the large database that exists in the published literature. According to the published literature, naphthalene has not induced gene mutations in bacterial assays or in a metabolically competent human cell line. However, naphthalene has caused cytotoxicity in some cell lines, and induced clastogenicity in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, in a human lymphoblastoid cell line, and in preimplantation mouse embryos. Some naphthalene metabolites were cytotoxic, but only naphthoquinones produced chromosomal damage in vitro. No chromosomal damage was observed in vivo in bone marrow erythrocytes from treated mice; however, a positive response was reported in a Drosophila assay for wing somatic mutation and recombination. The five unpublished studies of naphthalene genotoxicity include three studies in vitro (two Ames bacterial assays and an in vitro unscheduled DNA synthesis assay) and two in vivo (mouse micronucleus and in vivo unscheduled DNA synthesis). Naphthalene was inactive in all five studies, in agreement with reports in the published literature. Chronic inhalation of naphthalene over 2 yr induced an increased incidence of benign alveolar/bronchial adenomas in female mice, and nasal epithelial tumors in both sexes of rats. Inflammation, tissue damage, and subsequent regenerative hyperplasia at target organ sites occurred in both species. Results of standard genetic toxicity assays suggest that naphthalene is not likely to be genotoxic in vivo. Since the in vitro results come primarily from assays utilizing liver-mediated activation systems, and the in vivo results come from rodent organs that are not targets for tumors, tests using naphthalene-sensitive rodent tissues would determine the applicability of current data in addressing the mechanisms of these species and site-specific cancers. The standard assays reported here may be useful in predicting potential health hazard in other species, or in humans, in whom there are few reported instances of naphthalene-induced cancer, especially as more data on species-specific differences in naphthalene metabolism become available. Despite present data limitations, a threshold mechanism for tumorigenesis can be proposed. The absence of naphthalene-induced gene mutation and the presence of cytotoxicity and some chromosomal events in vitro are consistent with a threshold-related mechanism of tumor induction, driven by cytotoxicity and cell regeneration, followed by genetic events, or by accumulation of naphthalene at specific target sites to allow in situ formation of a genotoxic metabolite to trigger or enhance spontaneous tumor development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12554433     DOI: 10.1080/10937400306472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev        ISSN: 1093-7404            Impact factor:   6.393


  13 in total

1.  Transplantation of Airway Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Cells: A Future for Cell-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Moumita Ghosh; Shama Ahmad; Carl W White; Susan D Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.914

2.  Chromosomal damage in two species of aquatic turtles (Emys orbicularis and Mauremys caspica) inhabiting contaminated sites in Azerbaijan.

Authors:  Cole W Matson; Grigoriy Palatnikov; Arif Islamzadeh; Thomas J McDonald; Robin L Autenrieth; K C Donnelly; John W Bickham
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  Hypothesis-based weight-of-evidence evaluation and risk assessment for naphthalene carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa A Bailey; Marc A Nascarella; Laura E Kerper; Lorenz R Rhomberg
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Production of a specific monoclonal antibody for 1-naphthol based on novel hapten strategy and development of an easy-to-use ELISA in urine samples.

Authors:  Zi-Jian Chen; Xi-Xia Liu; Zhi-Li Xiao; Hui-Jun Fu; Yu-Ping Huang; Shu-Yi Huang; Yu-Dong Shen; Fan He; Xing-Xing Yang; Bruce Hammock; Zhen-Lin Xu
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.291

5.  Dichlorvos exposure impedes extraction and amplification of DNA from insects in museum collections.

Authors:  Marianne Espeland; Martin Irestedt; Kjell Arne Johanson; Monika Akerlund; Jan-Erik Bergh; Mari Källersjö
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  Naphthalene metabolism in relation to target tissue anatomy, physiology, cytotoxicity and tumorigenic mechanism of action.

Authors:  Kenneth T Bogen; Janet M Benson; Garold S Yost; John B Morris; Alan R Dahl; Harvey J Clewell; Kannan Krishnan; Curtis J Omiecinski
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Transplacental transfer of 2-naphthol in human placenta.

Authors:  Hisham Mirghani; Nawal Osman; Subramanian Dhanasekaran; Hassan M Elbiss; Gharid Bekdache
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2015-06-18

8.  Evolutionary, computational, and biochemical studies of the salicylaldehyde dehydrogenases in the naphthalene degradation pathway.

Authors:  Baolei Jia; Xiaomeng Jia; Kyung Hyun Kim; Zhong Ji Pu; Myung-Suk Kang; Che Ok Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Toxic by design? Formation of thermal degradants and cyanide from carboxamide-type synthetic cannabinoids CUMYL-PICA, 5F-CUMYL-PICA, AMB-FUBINACA, MDMB-FUBINACA, NNEI, and MN-18 during exposure to high temperatures.

Authors:  Richard C Kevin; Alexander L Kovach; Timothy W Lefever; Thomas F Gamage; Jenny L Wiley; Iain S McGregor; Brian F Thomas
Journal:  Forensic Toxicol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Estrogenic Activity of Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons Used in Printing Inks.

Authors:  Patrick Tarnow; Christoph Hutzler; Stefan Grabiger; Karsten Schön; Tewes Tralau; Andreas Luch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.