BACKGROUND: Information on women with domestic violence (DV) suggests increased healthcare utilization across all levels of care and many diagnoses. In the present ancillary study (1997-2002), derived from a large, group-randomized intervention trial we conducted in a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO) (1995-1998), we examined total and incremental utilization rates, costs, and patterns for women aged >/=18 years with DV identified through the record reviews conducted for the trial. By the choice of comparison groups used, our present aim was to "bracket" any associated increase in utilization. METHODS: We compared visits and costs of medical-record confirmed cases of DV (n =62) to those for women without evidence of DV in the record (n =2287). These two groups were derived from women making visits for any one of four index reasons (injury, chronic pelvic pain, depression, or physical examination) associated with higher risk of DV or higher likelihood of its discussion. We constructed a second comparison group (n =6032) from the general population of enrolled women. We used the Chronic Disease Score to adjust for comorbidity. RESULTS: After adjusting for comorbidity, we found a 1.6-fold higher rate of all visits (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4-1.9) and 1.6-fold higher estimated costs (95% CI=1.3-2.0) for abused women compared to non-DV women. The rates were 2.3-fold higher when compared to all enrolled women. CONCLUSIONS: Women with medical-record-documented DV demonstrate a pattern of increased utilization and costs across all levels of care and types of diagnoses. We conclude that being a DV case-patient is associated with between 1.6- and 2.3-fold increases in total utilization and costs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Information on women with domestic violence (DV) suggests increased healthcare utilization across all levels of care and many diagnoses. In the present ancillary study (1997-2002), derived from a large, group-randomized intervention trial we conducted in a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO) (1995-1998), we examined total and incremental utilization rates, costs, and patterns for women aged >/=18 years with DV identified through the record reviews conducted for the trial. By the choice of comparison groups used, our present aim was to "bracket" any associated increase in utilization. METHODS: We compared visits and costs of medical-record confirmed cases of DV (n =62) to those for women without evidence of DV in the record (n =2287). These two groups were derived from women making visits for any one of four index reasons (injury, chronic pelvic pain, depression, or physical examination) associated with higher risk of DV or higher likelihood of its discussion. We constructed a second comparison group (n =6032) from the general population of enrolled women. We used the Chronic Disease Score to adjust for comorbidity. RESULTS: After adjusting for comorbidity, we found a 1.6-fold higher rate of all visits (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.4-1.9) and 1.6-fold higher estimated costs (95% CI=1.3-2.0) for abused women compared to non-DV women. The rates were 2.3-fold higher when compared to all enrolled women. CONCLUSIONS:Women with medical-record-documented DV demonstrate a pattern of increased utilization and costs across all levels of care and types of diagnoses. We conclude that being a DV case-patient is associated with between 1.6- and 2.3-fold increases in total utilization and costs.
Authors: Alexander C Tsai; Sheri D Weiser; Samantha E Dilworth; Martha Shumway; Elise D Riley Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Tiffany A Edwards; Debra Houry; Robin S Kemball; Sharon E Harp; Louise-Anne McNutt; Helen Straus; Karin V Rhodes; Catherine Cerulli; Nadine J Kaslow Journal: J Clin Psychol Date: 2006-12
Authors: C Nadine Wathen; Masako Tanaka; Cristina Catallo; Adrianne C Lebner; M Kinneret Friedman; Mark D Hanson; Clare Freeman; Susan M Jack; Ellen Jamieson; Harriet L Macmillan Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 2.463