BACKGROUND: To clarify the clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (Flk-1), in esophageal cancers, we evaluated the relationships between the expression of VEGF and its receptors, tumor microvessel density (MVD), clinicopathological factors and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) specimens were obtained during surgery from 64 previously untreated patients. Expression levels of VEGF and its receptors were determined immunohistochemically, and tumor MVD was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four (37.5%) of the tumors showed diffuse VEGF immunoreactivity. VEGF expression was significantly correlated with tumor status (p < 0.05) and poor prognosis (log-rank; p < 0.05). VEGFR-1 immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of the cancer cells in 27 patients (42.2%). VEGFR-1-positive cancers tended to be associated with poorer nodal status (p = 0.1513), but VEGFR-1 expression did not correlate with prognosis in the univariate survival analysis (p = 0.2964). VEGFR-2 immunoreactivity was detected in the cancer cell cytoplasm in 26 patients (40.6%), but VEGFR-2 expression did not correlate with clinicopathological factors or prognosis. Comparison of the MVD and clinicopathological characteristics revealed significant associations between high MVD and poorer tumor status (p < 0.05), blood vessel invasion (p < 0.05) and poor prognosis (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, MVD was identified as an independent prognostic factor as well as depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. Although VEGF expression correlated significantly with the MVD (p < 0.05), the correlations between VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 expression and the MVD were not significant. There were, however, significant intercorrelations in expression between VEGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. CONCLUSION: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may play a role in the control of angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, although VEGF expression correlates significantly with coexpression of its receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, these receptors do not appear to contribute directly to tumor progression. Nevertheless, VEGF and its receptors represent a logical target for antiangiogenic therapy for esophageal SCC.
BACKGROUND: To clarify the clinical significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (Flk-1), in esophageal cancers, we evaluated the relationships between the expression of VEGF and its receptors, tumor microvessel density (MVD), clinicopathological factors and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) specimens were obtained during surgery from 64 previously untreated patients. Expression levels of VEGF and its receptors were determined immunohistochemically, and tumor MVD was assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four (37.5%) of the tumors showed diffuse VEGF immunoreactivity. VEGF expression was significantly correlated with tumor status (p < 0.05) and poor prognosis (log-rank; p < 0.05). VEGFR-1 immunoreactivity was detected in the cytoplasm of the cancer cells in 27 patients (42.2%). VEGFR-1-positive cancers tended to be associated with poorer nodal status (p = 0.1513), but VEGFR-1 expression did not correlate with prognosis in the univariate survival analysis (p = 0.2964). VEGFR-2 immunoreactivity was detected in the cancer cell cytoplasm in 26 patients (40.6%), but VEGFR-2 expression did not correlate with clinicopathological factors or prognosis. Comparison of the MVD and clinicopathological characteristics revealed significant associations between high MVD and poorer tumor status (p < 0.05), blood vessel invasion (p < 0.05) and poor prognosis (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, MVD was identified as an independent prognostic factor as well as depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. Although VEGF expression correlated significantly with the MVD (p < 0.05), the correlations between VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 expression and the MVD were not significant. There were, however, significant intercorrelations in expression between VEGF, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. CONCLUSION:Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may play a role in the control of angiogenesis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, although VEGF expression correlates significantly with coexpression of its receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, these receptors do not appear to contribute directly to tumor progression. Nevertheless, VEGF and its receptors represent a logical target for antiangiogenic therapy for esophageal SCC.
Authors: Traci A Wilgus; Annette M Matthies; Katherine A Radek; Julia V Dovi; Aime L Burns; Ravi Shankar; Luisa A DiPietro Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Alexander Schultze; Isabel Ben Batalla; Sabine Riethdorf; Michael Bubenheim; Emre Yekebas; Andreas Erbersdobler; Uta Reichelt; Katharina E Effenberger; Thomas Schmidt; Jakob R Izbicki; Carsten Bokemeyer; Klaus Pantel; Walter Fiedler; Sonja Loges Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2012-04-08 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: K Araki; T Shimura; H Suzuki; S Tsutsumi; W Wada; T Yajima; T Kobayahi; N Kubo; H Kuwano Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: T Miyazaki; H Kato; M Nakajima; A Faried; J Takita; M Sohda; Y Fukai; S Yamaguchi; N Masuda; R Manda; M Fukuchi; H Ojima; K Tsukada; H Kuwano Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: N Tanaka; H Kato; T Inose; H Kimura; A Faried; M Sohda; M Nakajima; Y Fukai; T Miyazaki; N Masuda; M Fukuchi; H Kuwano Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 7.640