Literature DB >> 12552597

Functional and molecular MR imaging of angiogenesis: seeing the target, seeing it work.

Michal Neeman1.   

Abstract

Intensive research over the last years led to the discovery of multiple molecular pathways and intricate regulatory network controlling the growth and regression of blood vessels in general and angiogenesis in particular. The difficulties in elucidation of the regulation of angiogenesis, stems from the inherent complexity due to participation of many cell types, under a dominant impact of physiological and environmental effects of flow, perfusion, and oxygenation. Major advances were achieved with the use of sophisticated transgenic mice models engineered so as to provide spatially and temporally controlled expression of specific factors alone or in combination. In vivo analysis of these models frequently requires the use of non-invasive imaging modalities for measurement of functional parameters of the vasculature along with dynamic molecular information. Optical methods are extensively applied for the study of angiogenesis [Brown et al., 2001] but provide very limited tissue penetration. MRI offers the advantage of being non-invasive with uniform and relatively high spatial resolution for deep tissues. Multiple MRI approaches for monitoring angiogenesis were developed over the last years, each looking at a particular step in the process. The aim of this paper is to analyze the clinical, pharmaceutical, and biological needs for imaging of angiogenesis, and to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of functional and molecular imaging for monitoring angiogenesis. The inherent problem of validation of different measures of angiogenesis, and the advantages and limitations associated with application of MRI based methods, as surrogates for other measurements of angiogenesis will be discussed. The terms molecular imaging and functional imaging are frequently loosely defined with a significant overlap between the two. For the sake of this paper we will apply a narrower definition of both terms, where molecular imaging will apply to methods directed towards detection of specific biological molecules that participate directly in (regulation of) a physiological process; while functional imaging will be used to describe those methods that aim to detect the physiological response to a defined (molecular) stimulus. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12552597     DOI: 10.1002/jcb.10399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl        ISSN: 0733-1959


  16 in total

1.  MRI of blood-brain barrier permeability in cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Quan Jiang; James R Ewing; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 2.  Photoacoustic imaging and characterization of the microvasculature.

Authors:  Song Hu; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 3.  Applications and development of permeability imaging in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Guangming Zhu; Nan Liu; Ying Li; Yonghong Xia
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Imaging hypoxia in gliomas.

Authors:  I Mendichovszky; A Jackson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Mean microvessel segment length and radius after embolic stroke: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM).

Authors:  Asamoah Bosomtwi; Michael Chopp; Li Zhang; Zheng Gang Zhang; Mei Lu; Quan Jiang
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Adaptive background noise bias suppression in contrast-free ultrasound microvascular imaging.

Authors:  Rohit Nayak; Mostafa Fatemi; Azra Alizad
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Contrast enhancement in atherosclerosis development in a mouse model: in vivo results at 2 Tesla.

Authors:  L Chaabane; N Pellet; M C Bourdillon; C Desbleds Mansard; A Sulaiman; G Hadour; F Thivolet-Béjui; P Roy; A Briguet; P Douek; E Canet Soulas
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Rapid simultaneous acquisition of T1 and T2 mapping images using multishot double spin-echo EPI and automated variations of TR and TE (ms-DSEPI-T12).

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yi Feng; Zheng-Rong Lu; Glen Morrell; Eun-Kee Jeong
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Quantitative evaluation of microvascular density after stroke in rats using MRI.

Authors:  Asamoah Bosomtwi; Quan Jiang; Guang L Ding; Li Zhang; Zheng G Zhang; Mei Lu; James R Ewing; Michael Chopp
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.200

10.  Imaging challenges in biomaterials and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Alyssa A Appel; Mark A Anastasio; Jeffery C Larson; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.