Literature DB >> 12551783

Postterm with favorable cervix: is induction necessary?

Boonsri Chanrachakul1, Yongyoth Herabutya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the cesarean rate between expectant management and immediate induction in the otherwise uncomplicated postterm pregnancy with favorable cervix. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 249 women with uncomplicated pregnancies at 41 weeks plus 3 days (290 days) with favorable cervix (Bishop score > or =6) were randomized to either expectant management (n=125) or immediate induction of labor (n=124). The women in the induction group were sent to labor ward for induction by artificial rupture of membranes (ARM) and/or oxytocin infusion. The women with expectant management had nonstress test (NST) and amniotic fluid index (AFI) performed once a week and twice a week after 43 weeks of gestation until spontaneous labor.
RESULTS: The cesarean rate was not different between expectant management and immediate induction (21.6% versus 26.6%; P=0.36). Ninety-five percent of the expectant group delivered within 1 week after enrollment, and all of them delivered within 9 days after randomization. Maternal and fetal complications in both groups were not different. There was also no difference in the mean birth weight (P=0.24) and the frequency of macrosomia (birth weight > or = 4000 g) between the two groups (P=0.23).
CONCLUSION: Cesarean section rate between expectant management and immediate induction in the otherwise uncomplicated postterm pregnancy with favorable cervix was not different. Due to the very low adverse perinatal outcome, both expectant management and immediate induction are acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12551783     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00243-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  12 in total

Review 1.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

2.  Induction of Labour in Late and Postterm Pregnancies and its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcome.

Authors:  F Thangarajah; P Scheufen; V Kirn; P Mallmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  Amniotomy plus intravenous oxytocin for induction of labour.

Authors:  G R Howarth; D J Botha
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

Review 4.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 5.  Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ekaterina Mishanina; Ewelina Rogozinska; Tej Thatthi; Rehan Uddin-Khan; Khalid S Khan; Catherine Meads
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Anjali J Kaimal; Jonathan M Snowden; James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 8.  Elective induction for pregnancies at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation and its impact on stillbirths: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arwa Abbas Hussain; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Aamer Imdad; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Postterm pregnancy.

Authors:  M Galal; I Symonds; H Murray; F Petraglia; R Smith
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

Review 10.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.