Literature DB >> 12548720

Electrostatic component of solvation: comparison of SCRF continuum models.

Carles Curutchet1, Christopher J Cramer, Donald G Truhlar, Manuel F Ruiz-López, Daniel Rinaldi, Modesto Orozco, F Javier Luque.   

Abstract

We report a systematic comparison of the electrostatic contributions to the free energy of solvation from three different kinds of quantum mechanical self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) methods. We also compare the liquid-phase dipole moments as a measure of the solute's response to the reaction field of the solvent. In particular, we compare these quantities for the generalized Born model as implemented in the SM5.42R method, the multipolar expansion model developed at Nancy, and the MST version of the polarizable continuum model. All calculations are carried out at the HF/6-31G(d) level. The effects of various choices of solute cavities and representations of the charge density are examined. The test set consists of 18 molecules containing prototypical polar groups, and three different values of the dielectric permittivity are considered. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 24: 284-297, 2003

Year:  2003        PMID: 12548720     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  5 in total

1.  Reparameterized Austin Model 1 for quantitative structure-property relationships in liquid media.

Authors:  Dimitar A Dobchev; Mati Karelson
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Hydration Free Energies in the FreeSolv Database Calculated with Polarized Iterative Hirshfeld Charges.

Authors:  Maximiliano Riquelme; Alejandro Lara; David L Mobley; Toon Verstraelen; Adelio R Matamala; Esteban Vöhringer-Martinez
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Performance of the IEF-MST solvation continuum model in the SAMPL2 blind test prediction of hydration and tautomerization free energies.

Authors:  Ignacio Soteras; Modesto Orozco; F Javier Luque
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  The AGBNP2 Implicit Solvation Model.

Authors:  Emilio Gallicchio; Kristina Paris; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Density functional conformational study of 2-O-sulfated 3,6 anhydro-α-D-galactose and of neo-κ- and ι-carrabiose molecules in gas phase and water.

Authors:  Noreya Bestaoui-Berrekhchi-Berrahma; Philippe Derreumaux; Majda Sekkal-Rahal; Michael Springborg; Adlane Sayede; Noureddine Yousfi; Abd-Ed-Daim Kadoun
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 1.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.