Literature DB >> 12546582

Correlation of periprocedural systolic blood pressure changes with neurological events in high-risk carotid stent patients.

Marcus Howell1, Zvonimir Krajcer, Kathy Dougherty, Neil Strickman, Mark Skolkin, Barry Toombs, David Paniagua.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine retrospectively the magnitude of change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) during carotid artery stenting and its relationship to neurological events.
METHODS: In a 5-year period ending October 2000, 60 patients (36 men; mean age 67 +/- 9 years) were enrolled in a study to evaluate stenting in symptomatic or asymptomatic high-risk patients with > or =70% carotid artery stenosis. The majority (48, 80%) of the patients were symptomatic. Five patients with bilateral lesions were treated in staged procedures. Sixteen (25%) of the 65 lesions were postsurgical stenoses and 12 (18%) were secondary to neck radiation therapy.
RESULTS: There were 2 (3%) minor and 2 (3%) major strokes (94% procedural success), of which 1 was fatal. Six (9%) transient neurological events were recorded during balloon inflation. The mean SBP change during or after stenting in 55 cases without neurological events was 34 +/- 14 mmHg, while the patients with transient or permanent neurological events had significantly greater changes in SBP (107 +/- 31 mmHg [p<0.003] and 134 +/- 14 mmHg [p<0.001], respectively). Patients exhibiting neurological sequelae had significantly higher SBP before the procedure than those without complications (203 +/- 30 versus 165 +/- 23 mmHg, p<0.001). There were no neurological events in patients with a <50-mmHg change in SBP.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severely elevated baseline SBP (>180 mmHg) may be at higher risk for hemodynamic instability and neurological events during carotid stenting. The greater the change in SBP, the more severe the neurological event seems to be, but further studies in a greater number of patients are needed to evaluate the potential causes of SBP fluctuations in an effort to avoid neurological events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12546582     DOI: 10.1177/152660280200900614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  12 in total

1.  Carotid baroreceptor reaction after stenting in 2 locations of carotid bulb lesions of different embryologic origin.

Authors:  D C Suh; J L Kim; E H Kim; J K Kim; J-H Shin; D H Hyun; H Y Lee; D H Lee; J S Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  In Silico Hemodynamics and Filtering Evaluation of a Commercial Embolic Protection Device.

Authors:  Antonio Gil; Pedro Quintero; Andrea Mares; Juan Ribera de Serra; Manuel Ignacio Sánchez-Nevárez; Manuel Miralles
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Preoperative assessment of adult patients for intracranial surgery.

Authors:  Vanitha Sivanaser; Pirjo Manninen
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-03-31

4.  Hemodynamic instability during carotid angioplasty and stenting-relationship of calcified plaque and its characteristics.

Authors:  Jin Sue Jeon; Seung Hun Sheen; Gyojun Hwang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  The Prevalence and Factors Contributing to Hemodynamic Depression in Patients Undergoing Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting.

Authors:  Afshin Borhani Haghighi; Safoora Kokabi; Samaneh Yousefi; Mehrdad Emami; Abdolhamid Shariat; Alireza Nikseresht; Nahid Ashjazadeh; Sadegh Izadi; Peyman Petramfar; Maryam Poursadegh; Abbas Rahimi Jaberi; Sajjad Emami; Hamid Agheli; Reza Nemati; Ehsan Yaghoubi; Kaveh Kashani; Majid Panahandeh; Seyed Moslem Heidari-Khormizi; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Randal Edgell
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-10

6.  Predictors and timing of hypotension and bradycardia after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  P Lavoie; J Rutledge; M A Dawoud; M Mazumdar; H Riina; Y P Gobin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The role of perfusion computed tomography in the prediction of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.

Authors:  Chien Hung Chang; Ting Yu Chang; Yeu Jhy Chang; Kuo Lun Huang; Shy Chyi Chin; Shan Jin Ryu; Tao Chieh Yang; Tsong Hai Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mechanism of Procedural Stroke Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting Within the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) Randomised Trial.

Authors:  A Huibers; D Calvet; F Kennedy; K R Czuriga-Kovács; R L Featherstone; F L Moll; M M Brown; T Richards; G J de Borst
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Staged carotid artery angioplasty and stenting for patients with high-grade carotid stenosis with high risk of developing hyperperfusion injury: a retrospective analysis of 44 cases.

Authors:  Dapeng Mo; Gang Luo; Bo Wang; Ning Ma; Feng Gao; Xuan Sun; Xiaotong Xu; Zhongrong Miao
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2016-12-19

Review 10.  Selective-versus-Standard Poststent Dilation for Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  O Petr; W Brinjikji; M H Murad; B Glodny; G Lanzino
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.