Literature DB >> 12546523

Focus on the individual--quality of life assessments in oncology.

Asa Kettis Lindblad1, Lena Ring, Bengt Glimelius, Mats G Hansson.   

Abstract

In this review we investigate how assessments of quality of life (QoL) can be used in daily clinical practice. The focus is on individualized QoL assessments, but computerized-adaptive testing and interpretation of QoL scores are also considered. Quality of life (QoL) measurements have been used relatively infrequently in clinical practice, although individualized care planning and follow-up based on QoL information may lead to better outcomes of treatment and informed and autonomous decision-making by patients. A recent approach in assessing QoL is by individualized measures, which tap QoL as defined by the individual patient. Individualized QoL instruments, such as the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL) and the Patient-Generated Index (PGI), have obvious appeal for use in clinical practice, since they incorporate topics of greatest concern to the individual patient, while also capturing their ratings and weightings. However, before general use in daily clinical practice can be recommended, some aspects of these instruments require further research, particularly issues concerning reliability, feasibility, interpretation and effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12546523     DOI: 10.1080/028418602320807775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Living with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: decent care-insufficient medical and genetic information: a qualitative study of MEN 1 patients in a Swedish hospital.

Authors:  Nina Strømsvik; Karin Nordin; Gunilla Berglund; Lars F Engebretsen; Mats G Hansson; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Impact of reconceptualization response shift on rating of quality of life over time among people with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; B Gagnon; S Ahmed; A M Rodríguez; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Determinants of health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  L Wettergren; M Björkholm; U Axdorph; A Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Use of the Patient-generated Index in systemic sclerosis to assess patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Sofia de Achaval; Michael A Kallen; Maureen D Mayes; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 4.666

6.  Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting?

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; E de Vogel-Voogt; E M Noordijk; T P M Vliet Vlieland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Assessment of quality of life in veterinary practice: developing tools for companion animal carers and veterinarians.

Authors:  Siobhan Mullan
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2015-05-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.