Literature DB >> 12544817

Engaging health care consumers to improve the quality of care.

Judith H Hibbard1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Researchers and policy makers have focused on informed choice as the primary role for consumers in improving care. Consumers may play two other roles in improving quality--by being active participants in their care (coproducer role) and by evaluating the care they receive (evaluator role). Enhancing the roles consumers are able to play in the health care system may significantly increase their influence on quality.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence available on the contribution of consumers to quality through the coproducer and evaluator roles. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Conceptual framework and review of the literature.
FINDINGS: Patients who engage in collaborative care, shared decision-making with their providers, and chronic disease self-management have improved health outcomes. Training patients with chronic diseases to self-manage their disease increases functioning, reduces pain, and decreases costs. Developing the evaluator role will support and increase the effectiveness of the other two roles-the informed choice role and the coproducer role.
CONCLUSIONS: Only the informed choice role is being actively promoted for consumers. Increasing the coproducer role would require system and provider change, as well as an increase in consumers' skills and knowledge and a change in their understanding of their appropriate role. Harnessing the power of consumers to create change will depend on the degree to which all these roles are encouraged and supported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544817     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200301001-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  44 in total

1.  Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B J Edwards; A D Bunta; J Anderson; A Bobb; A Hahr; K J O'Leary; A Agulnek; L Andruszyn; K A Cameron; M May; N H Kazmers; N Dillon; D W Baker; M V Williams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Continence specialists use of quality of life information in routine practice: a national survey of practitioners.

Authors:  Kirstie L Haywood; Andrew M Garratt; Sandra Carrivick; Joanne Mangnall; Suzanne M Skevington
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Using photovoice to explore patient perceptions of patient-centered care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Salva Najib Balbale; Megan A Morris; Sherri L LaVela
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Getting the balance right: thick and thin approaches to harmonizing state particularism and the human right to health.

Authors:  Stephen Buetow
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Treatment Outcome, Duration, and Costs: A Comparison of Performance Indicators Using Data from Eight Mental Health Care Providers in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E de Beurs; E H Warmerdam; S C C Oudejans; M Spits; P Dingemanse; S D D de Graaf; I W de Groot; H Houben; W G E Kuyck; E O Noorthoorn; M A Nugter; S C C Robbers; G E van Son
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2018-03

7.  What do older patients with early breast cancer want to know while undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy?

Authors:  Jennifer Jing-Wen Wong; Laura D'Alimonte; Jan Angus; Lawrence Paszat; Barbara Soren; Ewa Szumacher
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  How does patient-clinician information engagement influence self-reported cancer-related problems?: findings from a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Andy S L Tan; Angel Bourgoin; Stacy W Gray; Katrina Armstrong; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prediction of health professionals' intention to screen for decisional conflict in clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Ian D Graham; Annette C O'Connor; Michèle Aubin; Lucie Baillargeon; Yvan Leduc; Jean Maziade
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.