Literature DB >> 12544545

Burden of illness score for elderly persons: risk adjustment incorporating the cumulative impact of diseases, physiologic abnormalities, and functional impairments.

Sharon K Inouye1, Sidney T Bogardus, Gail Vitagliano, Mayur M Desai, Christianna S Williams, Jacqueline N Grady, Jeanne D Scinto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a new risk adjustment index-the Burden of Illness Score for Elderly Persons (BISEP)-which integrates multiple domains, including diseases, physiologic abnormalities, and functional impairments. RESEARCH DESIGN
SUBJECTS: The index was developed in a prospective cohort of 525 patients aged > or = 70 years from the medicine service of a university hospital. The index was validated in a cohort of 1246 patients aged > or = 65 years from 27 hospitals. The outcome was 1-year mortality.
RESULTS: Five risk factors were selected from diagnosis, laboratory, and functional status axes: high-risk diagnoses, albumin < or = 3.5 mg/dL, creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, dementia, and walking impairment. The BISEP score (range 0-7) created four groups of increasing risk: group I (score 0-1), group II (2), group III (3), and group IV (> or = 4). In the development cohort, where overall mortality was 154/525 (29%), 1-year mortality rates increased significantly across each risk group, from 8% to 24%, 51%, and 74%, in groups I to IV respectively (chi(2) trend, = 0.001)--an overall 17-fold increased risk by hazard ratio. The c-statistic for the final model was 0.83. Corresponding rates in the validation cohort, where overall mortality was 488/1246 (39%), were 5%, 17%, 33%, and 61% in groups I to IV, respectively (chi(2) trend, = 0.001)-an overall 18-fold increased risk by hazard ratio. The c-statistic for the final model was 0.77. In each cohort, sequential addition of variables from different sources (eg, administrative, laboratory, and chart) substantially improved model fit and predictive accuracy. BISEP had significantly superior mortality prediction compared with five widely used measures.
CONCLUSIONS: BISEP provides a useful new risk adjustment system for hospitalized older persons. Although index performance using different data sources has been evaluated, the full BISEP model, incorporating disease, laboratory, and functional impairment information, demonstrates the best performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544545     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000039829.60382.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  31 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the short physical performance battery in older patients discharged from acute care hospitals.

Authors:  Andrea Corsonello; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Claudio Pedone; Sabrina Garasto; Irma Laino; Silvia Bustacchini; Luigi Pranno; Bruno Mazzei; Giuseppe Passarino; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.663

Review 2.  How should we use age to ration health care? Lessons from the case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Arthur L Caplan; Roy D Bloom; Peter L Abt; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  [People with dementia in acute hospitals. Literature review of prevalence and reasons for hospital admission].

Authors:  C Pinkert; B Holle
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Derivation and validation of a mortality-risk index from a cohort of frail elderly patients hospitalised in medical wards via emergencies: the SAFES study.

Authors:  M Dramé; J L Novella; P O Lang; D Somme; N Jovenin; I Lanièce; P Couturier; D Heitz; J B Gauvain; T Voisin; B De Wazières; R Gonthier; J Ankri; C Jeandel; O Saint-Jean; F Blanchard; D Jolly
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Just ask: discussing goals of care with patients in hospital with serious illness.

Authors:  John J You; Robert A Fowler; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Predictive modeling of U.S. health care spending in late life.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Sendhil Mullainathan; Ziad Obermeyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  From Bedside to Bench: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Comorbidity and Multiple Morbidity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Cynthia M Boyd; Christine S Ritchie; Edmond F Tipton; Stephanie A Studenski; Darryl Wieland
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Development and Validation of a 10-Year Mortality Prediction Model: Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Five Cohorts of Older Adults in Developed and Developing Countries.

Authors:  Claudia Kimie Suemoto; Peter Ueda; Hiram Beltrán-Sánchez; Maria Lucia Lebrão; Yeda Aparecida Duarte; Rebeca Wong; Goodarz Danaei
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Predicting early mortality among elderly patients hospitalised in medical wards via emergency department: the SAFES cohort study.

Authors:  M Drame; N Jovenin; J L Novella; P O Lang; D Somme; I Laniece; T Voisin; P Blanc; P Couturier; J B Gauvain; F Blanchard; D Jolly
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.075

10.  Nondisease-specific problems and all-cause mortality in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study.

Authors:  C Barrett Bowling; John N Booth; Monika M Safford; Heather E Whitson; Christine S Ritchie; Virginia G Wadley; Mary Cushman; Virginia J Howard; Richard M Allman; Paul Muntner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.