Literature DB >> 12544296

Multi-institutional long-term experience with conservative surgery for invasive penile carcinoma.

Nabil K Bissada1, Hossam H Yakout, Wahib E Fahmy, Maged S Gayed, A Karim Touijer, Graham F Greene, Kamal A Hanash.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis occurs on the glans, prepuce, glans and prepuce, coronal sulcus and shaft. Penile squamous cell carcinoma subsequently invades local structures, corpora cavernosa and the urethra, and metastasizes to the inguinal lymph nodes. Invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis usually requires total or partial penectomy. We studied the effect of primary tumor resections tailored to the anatomical extent of the cancer with preservation of uninvolved structures in select patients with invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients between 39 and 82 years old were treated with unconventional conservative surgical excision of the primary penile lesion. More than 130 patients were excluded from the study because they were treated with partial or total penectomy, Mohs' surgery or more extensive surgery. The 30 patients underwent preoperative biopsy with careful mapping of the extent of the disease. Patient age, tumor extent and grade, operative details, outcome and length of followup were analyzed.
RESULTS: Tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 8 cm. in diameter. Tumors were well differentiated in 19 patients, moderately differentiated in 5 and poorly differentiated in 6. A total of 17 patients underwent ilioinguinal lymphadenectomy, 12 of whom had pathologically positive lymph nodes. Inguinal radiation was used in 2 patients. Chemotherapy was given to 7 patients with extensive inguinal lymphadenopathy and to 2 of 5 with pathologically positive lymph nodes. Followup ranged from 12 to 360 months. A total of 21 patients had no evidence of disease at last followup. Tumor resection with no sacrifice of function was performed in 2 patients in whom 3 small recurrences developed. One patient with numerous tumors had 2 small recurrences, which were completely excised with no further recurrence. Of the 7 patients with advanced lymphadenopathy 5 and of 5 patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes at presentation 1 died of the cancer but had no local recurrence in the penis.
CONCLUSIONS: In a minority of patients with anatomically suitable penile cancer conservative surgical techniques are safe and provide equal tumor control compared to conventional resections. The anatomical situation and tumor characteristics should dictate the choice of treatment for the primary penile lesion. Inguinal lymph nodes should be managed by appropriately established guidelines but should not influence the extent of primary penile lesion resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544296     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000043808.58188.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant therapy combined with a BMP regimen for treating penile cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: a retrospective study in China.

Authors:  Benkui Zou; Zengchi Han; Zhendan Wang; Jiasheng Bian; Jian Xu; Huansheng Wang; Mingshan Yang; Fajun Pei; Sheng Li; Zhonghua Xu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer in the era of routine multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  M J Connor; M A Gorin; H U Ahmed; R Nigam
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Organ-sparing procedures in GU cancer: part 2-organ-sparing procedures in testicular and penile tumors.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Mahmoud I Khalil; Ehab Eltahawy; Rodney Davis; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Subtotal surgical therapy for localized prostate cancer: a single-center precision prostatectomy experience in 25 patients, and SEER-registry data analysis.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Wooju Jeong; Jacob Keeley; Firas Abdollah; Oudai Hassan; Nilesh Gupta; Mani Menon
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

5.  Penile cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Matthew C Biagioli; Mario A Eisenberger; Richard E Greenberg; Harry W Herr; Brant A Inman; Deborah A Kuban; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Jeff Michalski; Lance Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Jerome P Richie; Wade J Sexton; William U Shipley; Eric J Small; Donald L Trump; Geoffrey Wile; Timothy G Wilson; Mary Dwyer; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  The Impact of Routine Frozen Section Assessment During Penectomy on Surgical Margin Status and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandra M Danakas; Caroline Bsirini; Hiroshi Miyamoto
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  Sexual outcomes after organ potency-sparing surgery and glans reconstruction in patients with penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Gaetano Gulino; Francesco Sasso; Giuseppe Palermo; Alfonso D'Onofrio; Marco Racioppi; Emilio Sacco; Francesco Pinto; Michele Antonucci; Alessandro D'Addessi; Pierfrancesco Bassi
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-04

8.  Organ-preserving surgery for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Francisco E Martins; Raul N Rodrigues; Tomé M Lopes
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-11-04

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of solid urethral and peri-urethral lesions.

Authors:  Andrew Del Gaizo; Alvin C Silva; Dora M Lam-Himlin; Brian C Allen; John Leyendecker; Akira Kawashima
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-05-19

10.  Current concepts of organ-sparing surgery in penile cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Nabil K Bissada
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.