Literature DB >> 12544012

Age and birth cohort effects on rates of alcohol dependence.

John P Rice1, Rosalind J Neuman, Nancy L Saccone, Jonathan Corbett, Nanette Rochberg, Victor Hesselbrock, Kathleen K Bucholz, Peter McGuffin, Theodore Reich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies of traits such as alcohol dependence and depression have often found lifetime rates in younger individuals exceeding those found in older individuals. This suggests additional influences of birth cohort or period effects so that individuals in later-born cohorts have an increased lifetime risk.
METHODS: Data from the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism were used to investigate secular trends for alcoholism and related conditions and to examine risk predictors while taking the cohort effect into account. We used data on 4099 interviewed parents and siblings of alcohol-dependent subjects and 1054 members of control families. We used survival analysis techniques and the Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate the relative risk for demographic covariates. We used the relative sample to predict risk in the sibling of the proband and family history information to determine whether there was a bias when deceased individuals were excluded from analysis.
RESULTS: In the control sample, we observed a 1.8% lifetime rate of DSM-III-R alcohol dependence in women born before 1940, as contrasted to a 13% rate in women born after 1960, and a 15% lifetime rate in men born before 1940, contrasted with a 28% rate in men born after 1960. As expected, lifetime rates in relatives were increased when compared with controls. Highly significant risk ratios (RR) were observed for gender (RR, 2.3), cohort of birth (RR, 1.5 over a decade), daily smoking (RR, 2.0), heavy smoking (RR, 3.0), and comorbid diagnoses of antisocial personality (RR, 2.2) and depression (RR, 1.6). Analysis of the family history data indicated higher rates of alcohol dependence in relatives who were deceased compared to those who were living.
CONCLUSIONS: Marked cohort differences were observed and may reflect real changes over time, or artifacts of memory recall, differential mortality, or public awareness. The analysis of all relatives (living or deceased) indicates that associated mortality may, in part, explain the secular trends seen when analyses are restricted to living, personally interviewed individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12544012     DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000047303.89421.AA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  22 in total

1.  Age-period-cohort analysis of Swiss suicide data, 1881-2000.

Authors:  Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross; Matthias Bopp; Michael Gostynski; Christoph Lauber; Felix Gutzwiller; Wulf Rössler
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Al-Anon family groups: newcomers and members.

Authors:  Christine Timko; Ruth Cronkite; Lee Ann Kaskutas; Alexandre Laudet; Jeffrey Roth; Rudolf H Moos
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.582

3.  Serotonin transporter gene promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and alcohol use in general population: interaction effect with birth cohort.

Authors:  Mariliis Vaht; Liis Merenäkk; Jarek Mäestu; Toomas Veidebaum; Jaanus Harro
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Age, period, and cohort effects in heavy episodic drinking in the US from 1985 to 2009.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Richard Miech
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Substance and Alcohol use in Young Adults in Turkey as Indicated by the CAGE Questionnaire and Drinking Frequency.

Authors:  Hatice Demirbaş
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 1.339

6.  Prevalence and correlates of fire-setting in the United States: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC).

Authors:  Carlos Blanco; Analucía A Alegría; Nancy M Petry; Jon E Grant; H Blair Simpson; Shang-Min Liu; Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 7.  Birth cohort effects and gender differences in alcohol epidemiology: a review and synthesis.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Guohua Li; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Race/ethnicity and sex differences in progression from drinking initiation to the development of alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Anika A H Alvanzo; Carla L Storr; Lareina La Flair; Kerry M Green; Fernando A Wagner; Rosa M Crum
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Evidence for a closing gender gap in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence in the United States population.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Bridget F Grant; Deborah S Hasin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Does Alcoholics Anonymous work differently for men and women? A moderated multiple-mediation analysis in a large clinical sample.

Authors:  John F Kelly; Bettina B Hoeppner
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.