Literature DB >> 12543525

The development of health technology assessment.

David Banta1.   

Abstract

The field of health technology assessment (HTA) is still relatively new, but it has shown remarkable growth over the last decade, having spread first from the United States to Europe, and now to the entire world. HTA seeks to couple evidence with decision-making, and thus has similarities to evidence-based health care and evidence-based policy-making. The early history of HTA, beginning around 1975, reveals a first period of synthesising available evidence-principally that dealing with efficacy and cost-effectiveness of health care interventions-so as to put it in a format helpful to health policy-makers, especially those in national governments. From 1985 or so, the focus of the second period was on seeking more effective links with these policy-makers, particularly in Europe. The most recent period, beginning in the late 1990s, has been increasingly devoted to more effective dissemination and implementation in order to influence administrators and clinicians. While early assessments tended to focus on large, expensive, machine-based technologies, the scope has gradually widened to include smaller technologies, 'softer' technologies (such as counselling), and health care needs. Actual assessments have also taken on broader issues, such as organisational, social, and ethical implications. In the Member States of the European Union (EU), HTA activities are increasingly visible, and almost all now have a national focus for HTA associated with the Ministry of Health or its equivalent. Central and Eastern European countries are also developing HTA activities. Most recently, HTA has been highlighted by health policy documents from the European Commission. It seems likely that HTA will in the future be institutionalised in some form as part of EU activities.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12543525     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00059-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  34 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  O E O'Sullivan; B A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Craig Mitton; Karissa M Johnston; Brian Harrigan; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cardiac-CT and Cardiac-MR examinations cost analysis, based on data of four Italian Centers.

Authors:  Maurizio Centonze; Giuseppe Lorenzin; Andrea Francesconi; Filippo Cademartiri; Giulia Casagranda; Michele Fusaro; Guido Ligabue; Giovanna Zanetti; Demetrio Spanti; Francesco De Cobelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy.

Authors:  Norman Daniels; Thalia Porteny; Julian Urritia
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-11-06

5.  The emergence of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  George Weisz; Alberto Cambrosio; Peter Keating; Loes Knaapen; Thomas Schlich; Virginie J Tournay
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Health technology assessment (HTA): ethical aspects.

Authors:  Dario Sacchini; Andrea Virdis; Pietro Refolo; Maddalena Pennacchini; Ignacio Carrasco de Paula
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-06-09

7.  Micro HTA as a tool for clinical governance: the experience of the Breast Unit in "Santa Maria" Terni Hospital.

Authors:  A Sanguinetti; R Lucchini; R Triola; S Avenia; G Bistoni; C Conti; S Santoprete; N Avenia
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

8.  Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Health technology assessment and thyroid surgery.

Authors:  R Lucchini; A Sanguinetti; M Monacelli; R Triola; S Avenia; C Conti; S Santoprete; N Avenia
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

10.  Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Robert G Newcombe; Mary Politi; Marie-Anne Durand; Elizabeth Drake; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Sara Khangura; Anton Saarimaki; Stephanie Sivell; Mareike Stiel; Steven J Bernstein; Nananda Col; Angela Coulter; Karen Eden; Martin Härter; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Nora Moumjid; Dawn Stacey; Richard Thomson; Tim Whelan; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.