Literature DB >> 12537221

Mediastinal lymph node staging in suspected lung cancer: comparison of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose and mediastinoscopy.

Thomas P Graeter1, Dirk Hellwig, Klaus Hoffmann, Dieter Ukena, Carl-Martin Kirsch, Hans-Joachim Schäfers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with bronchogenic carcinoma, mediastinal lymph node staging is essential for determining treatment options. In this retrospective analysis we compared the results of positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose with those of mediastinoscopy in nodal staging for suspected bronchogenic carcinoma.
METHODS: From March 1997 to June 2001, 102 patients (86 male,16 female, age 62 +/- 9 years) underwent both PET and mediastinoscopy for radiologically suspected mediastinal lymph node disease in bronchogenic carcinoma. Total body emission scans were acquired 90 to 150 minutes after injection of 230 MBq of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Mediastinoscopic evaluation of lymph node stations was performed according to the method of Mountain and Dresler (1R, 1L, 2L, 2R, 4L, 4R,7). Patients were eligible if surgical staging was performed within 6 weeks after the PET scan. RESULTS. Of the 102 patients, benign lesions were diagnosed in 15. In 87 patients malignant disease was proven by histology, and bronchogenic carcinoma was found in 82. Of 469 nodal stations analyzed, malignancy was documented by histology in 84. In PET analysis 79 true-positive and 304 true-negative samples were found. Five lymph node stations were false negative, and 81 samples were false positive. False-positive findings in PET frequently were seen in inflammatory lung disease. The sensitivity of PET was 94.1%, specificity was 79% with a diagnostic accuracy of 81.6%. The positive predictive value of PET was 49.3%, and the negative predictive value was 98.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with positive PET scan results histologic verification appears necessary for exact lymph node staging. In view of the negative predictive value mediastinoscopy can be omitted in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma whose PET scan results were negative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12537221     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04350-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

1.  [PET/CT in radiotherapy].

Authors:  M Weckesser; S Könemann; M Brinkmann; N Willich; O Schober
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  PET-CT in the staging and treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Ibeas; Blanca Cantos; José Manuel Gasent; Begoña Rodríguez; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  The use and misuse of positron emission tomography in lung cancer evaluation.

Authors:  Ching-Fei Chang; Afshin Rashtian; Michael K Gould
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.878

4.  Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kelvin K Yap; Kenneth S K Yap; Amanda J Byrne; Salvatore U Berlangieri; Aurora Poon; Paul Mitchell; Simon R Knight; Peter C Clarke; Anthony Harris; Andrew Tauro; Christopher C Rowe; Andrew M Scott
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Mediastinoscopy: trends and practice patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Daniel L Davenport; Victor A Ferraris; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node staging in patients with operable non-small-cell lung cancer and inflammatory lung disease.

Authors:  Young-Sil An; Joo Sung Sun; Kyung Joo Park; Sung Chul Hwang; Kwang Joo Park; Seung Soo Sheen; Sungsoo Lee; Kyi Beom Lee; Joon-Kee Yoon
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.584

7.  Diagnostic difficulties and pitfalls in rapid on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Sara E Monaco; Matthew J Schuchert; Walid E Khalbuss
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Limitations of PET/CT in the Detection of Occult N1 Metastasis in Clinical Stage I(T1-2aN0) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer for Staging Prior to Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Adil S Akthar; Mark K Ferguson; Matthew Koshy; Wickii T Vigneswaran; Renuka Malik
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-23

Review 9.  Positron emission tomography in lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nomori; Yasuomi Ohba; Kentaro Yoshimoto; Hidekatsu Shibata; Kenji Shiraishi; Takeshi Mori
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  Cardiopulmonary co-morbidity: a critical negative prognostic predictor for pulmonary resection following preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Masayoshi Inoue; Meinoshin Okumura; Masato Minami; Hiroyuki Shiono; Noriyoshi Sawabata; Tomoki Utsumi; Yuko Ohno; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.