Literature DB >> 12537052

Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing: a prospective, double-blind crossover study.

Paul E Johnson1, Peter C Belafsky, Gregory N Postma.   

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing (LPSDT) has become a popular means of detecting sensory deficits in patients with voice and/or swallowing complaints. During this procedure, transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL) using a specialized fiberoptic scope is performed in order to deliver discrete pulses of air to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Historically, topical anesthesia has been applied to the nasal mucosa to lessen discomfort during TFL. Because of the concern that topical nasal anesthesia could also anesthetize the laryngopharynx, it is usually not used during sensory testing. To prospectively compare LPSDT scores after the nasal administration of cocaine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, and saline solution, we prospectively evaluated 15 subjects undergoing LPSDT. Each had the procedure performed on 3 separate occasions. Before examination, each patient was administered either 4% cocaine, 0.05% oxymetazoline, or saline solution by atomizer (2 sprays of 1-second duration to each naris). By the conclusion of the study, each patient had undergone sensory testing with each of the test agents. During each examination, the minimal air pulse eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex was recorded for both sides of the laryngopharynx. Both patient and examiner were blinded to the test agent used. The mean sensory score for saline solution was 3.9 mm Hg. The sensory scores for oxymetazoline and cocaine were 3.4 and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. When compared to saline solution and oxymetazoline independently, sensory testing of the laryngopharynx during which the nose was anesthetized with cocaine resulted in similar thresholds for eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex (p = .40 and p = .85). We conclude that topical anesthesia can be applied to the nasal cavity during LPSDT without altering laryngeal sensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12537052     DOI: 10.1177/000348940311200104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  9 in total

1.  Alternative reinforcer response cost impacts cocaine choice in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.067

2.  Neurophysiology and Clinical Implications of the Laryngeal Adductor Reflex.

Authors:  Amanda S Domer; Maggie A Kuhn; Peter C Belafsky
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2013-09

3.  The effect of voluntary pharyngeal swallowing maneuvers on esophageal swallowing physiology.

Authors:  Ashli O'Rourke; Lori B Morgan; Enrique Coss-Adame; Michele Morrison; Paul Weinberger; Gregory Postma
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry and Impedance: Protocols and Metrics-Recommendations of a High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry International Working Group.

Authors:  Taher I Omari; Michelle Ciucci; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Ester Hernández; Katherine Hutcheson; Corinne Jones; Julia Maclean; Nogah Nativ-Zeltzer; Emily Plowman; Nicole Rogus-Pulia; Nathalie Rommel; Ashli O'Rourke
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Effects of topical nasal anesthetic on fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST).

Authors:  Erin E Kamarunas; Gary H McCullough; Tiffany J Guidry; Mark Mennemeier; Keith Schluterman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Pediatric FEESST: fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing.

Authors:  J Paul Willging; Dana M Thompson
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

7.  Advancing Laryngeal Adductor Reflex Testing Beyond Sensory Threshold Detection.

Authors:  Teresa E Lever; Ashley M Kloepper; Ian Deninger; Ali Hamad; Bridget L Hopewell; Alyssa K Ovaitt; Marlena Szewczyk; Filiz Bunyak; Bradford Zitsch; Brett Blake; Caitlin Vandell; Laura Dooley
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Relationship Between Laryngeal Sensory Deficits, Aspiration, and Pneumonia in Patients with Dysphagia.

Authors:  Asako Kaneoka; Jessica M Pisegna; Haruhi Inokuchi; Rumi Ueha; Takao Goto; Takaharu Nito; Cara E Stepp; Michael P LaValley; Nobuhiko Haga; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology - Current state of clinical and endoscopic diagnostics, evaluation, and therapy of swallowing disorders in children.

Authors:  Christoph Arens; Ingo F Herrmann; Saskia Rohrbach; Cornelia Schwemmle; Tadeus Nawka
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.