Literature DB >> 12535084

Divergent selection maintains adaptive differentiation despite high gene flow between sympatric rainbow smelt ecotypes (Osmerus mordax Mitchill).

Robert Saint-Laurent1, Michel Legault, Louis Bernatchez.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the relative role of historical factors and evolutionary forces in promoting population differentiation in a new case of sympatric dwarf and normal ecotypes of the rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax Mitchill) in Lac Saint-Jean (Québec, Canada). Our first objective was to test the hypothesis that the evolution of sympatric smelt ecotypes in Lac Saint-Jean has been contingent upon the secondary contact between two evolutionary lineages in postglacial times. Secondly, the QST method was applied to test the null hypothesis that the extent of phenotypic differences relative to that of neutral marker variation would be similar in comparisons involving populations within and among ecotypes. Thirdly, we applied a quantitative-genetic method as an exploratory assessment as to whether the amount of gene flow observed between populations could affect divergence in adaptive traits under specific conditions. This study revealed a unique situation of dwarf and normal smelt ecotypes that are, respectively, characterized by selmiparous and iteroparous life histories and the occurrence in each of two genetically distinct populations that synchronously use the same spawning habitat in two tributaries. Historical contingency has apparently played little role in the origin of these populations. In contrast, an important role of divergent natural selection in driving their phenotypic divergence was suggested. While divergent selection has apparently been strong enough to maintain phenotypic differentiation in the face of migration, this study suggests that gene flow has been sufficiently important to modulate the extent of adaptive differentiation being achieved between ecotypes, unless the extent of stabilizing selection acting on smelt ecotypes is much more pronounced than usually reported in natural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12535084     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01735.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  19 in total

1.  F(ST) and Q(ST) under neutrality.

Authors:  Judith R Miller; Bryan P Wood; Matthew B Hamilton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Tuomas Leinonen; R J Scott McCairns; Robert B O'Hara; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Fish Skin and Gut Microbiomes Show Contrasting Signatures of Host Species and Habitat.

Authors:  François-Étienne Sylvain; Aleicia Holland; Sidki Bouslama; Émie Audet-Gilbert; Camille Lavoie; Adalberto Luis Val; Nicolas Derome
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Genetic analysis of population differentiation and adaptation in Leuciscus waleckii.

Authors:  Yumei Chang; Ran Tang; Xiaowen Sun; Liqun Liang; Jinping Chen; Jinfeng Huang; Xinjie Dou; Ran Tao
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Ecological selection as the cause and sexual differentiation as the consequence of species divergence?

Authors:  Elen Oneal; L Lacey Knowles
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Where the lake meets the sea: strong reproductive isolation is associated with adaptive divergence between lake resident and anadromous three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Mark Ravinet; Rosaleen Hynes; Russell Poole; Tom F Cross; Phil McGinnity; Chris Harrod; Paulo A Prodöhl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Adaptive genetic divergence along narrow environmental gradients in four stream insects.

Authors:  Kozo Watanabe; So Kazama; Tatsuo Omura; Michael T Monaghan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Inter- and intraspecific genetic and morphological variation in a sibling pair of carabid species.

Authors:  Hilde Dhuyvetter; Jean-Pierre Maelfait; Konjev Desender
Journal:  Saline Systems       Date:  2007-04-24

9.  Gene flow and the genealogical history of Heliconius heurippa.

Authors:  Camilo Salazar; Chris D Jiggins; Jesse E Taylor; Marcus R Kronforst; Mauricio Linares
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Speciation reversal in European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus (L.)) caused by competitor invasion.

Authors:  Shripathi Bhat; Per-Arne Amundsen; Rune Knudsen; Karl Øystein Gjelland; Svein-Erik Fevolden; Louis Bernatchez; Kim Præbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.