Literature DB >> 12533652

Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging.

Hee-Sun Jung1, Won-Hee Jee, Thomas R McCauley, Kee-Yong Ha, Kyu-Ho Choi.   

Abstract

A study was performed to determine which magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings are useful in discrimination between metastatic compression fractures and acute osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine. The MR imaging findings in 27 patients with metastatic compression fractures and 55 patients with acute osteoporotic compression fractures were compared by using the chi(2) test. MR imaging findings suggestive of metastatic compression fractures were as follows: a convex posterior border of the vertebral body, abnormal signal intensity of the pedicle or posterior element, an epidural mass, an encasing epidural mass, a focal paraspinal mass, and other spinal metastases. MR imaging findings suggestive of acute osteoporotic compression fractures were as follows: a low-signal-intensity band on T1- and T2-weighted images, spared normal bone marrow signal intensity of the vertebral body, retropulsion of a posterior bone fragment, and multiple compression fractures. The signal intensity on fast spin-echo T2-weighted images obtained without fat suppression played little role in distinguishing between metastatic compression fractures and acute osteoporotic compression fractures. Copyright RSNA, 2003.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12533652     DOI: 10.1148/rg.231025043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  54 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided percutaneous spinal biopsy.

Authors:  Gajan Rajeswaran; Qaiser Malik; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Management of metastatic sacral tumours.

Authors:  Nasir A Quraishi; Kyriakos E Giannoulis; Kimberley L Edwards; Bronek M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Acute benign vertebral compression fractures: "see-through sign" on contrast-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Jinyoung Lee; Guen Young Lee; Woo Young Kang; Bo Reum Yoo; Yoon Joo Shin; Joong Mo Ahn; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MR imaging for differentiation of acute benign and neoplastic compression fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Andreas Feißt; Christoph Hans-Jürgen Endler; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Identifying osteoporotic vertebral endplate and cortex fractures.

Authors:  Yì Xiáng J Wáng; Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Min Deng; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-10

Review 6.  [Fracture diagnosis in osteoporosis].

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Dual-energy CT in vertebral compression fractures: performance of visual and quantitative analysis for bone marrow edema demonstration with comparison to MRI.

Authors:  Guillaume Bierry; Aïna Venkatasamy; Stéphane Kremer; Jean-Claude Dosch; Jean-Louis Dietemann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Spinous process fractures in osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.

Authors:  M R N Seo; S Y Park; J S Park; W Jin; K N Ryu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  [Imaging diagnostics in bone metastases].

Authors:  L Kintzelé; M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: diagnostic and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Thomas M Link; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Cornelis van Kuijk; Judith E Adams
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.