Literature DB >> 12532055

Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength.

Stephen D Murray1, Ross S Hobson.   

Abstract

Much of the research into composite adhesives suggests that these materials will deteriorate in the oral environment, but most of these claims are made on the basis of extrapolation from in vitro experiments; relatively little in vivo research has been conducted into the mechanical properties of composite adhesives. For this study, we recruited 20 volunteers to wear removable appliances containing orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel slabs for 12 weeks. Each appliance carried 3 brackets bonded with Transbond (3M Unitek UK; Bradford, United Kingdom) and 3 brackets bonded with Heliosit (Ivoclar-Vivadent; Leicester, United Kingdom). The bond strengths were tested at intervals of 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Control specimens were stored in sterile water at 37 degrees C and were debonded at the same time intervals. Transbond specimens debonded after 4 weeks in vivo had significantly (P <.05) lower bond strengths (9.78 megapascals [MPa]) than did the controls (14.34 MPa). In vivo, specimens bonded with Heliosit had significantly (P <.05) lower bond strengths after 4 weeks (8.16 MPa vs 10.96 MPa) and 8 weeks (9.96 MPa vs 13.61 MPa) than did the controls. These results indicate differences between bond strength testing in vitro and in vivo. Further research is required into the effects of the oral environment on bond strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12532055     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  21 in total

1.  Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling.

Authors:  L Brauchli; M Zeller; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Shear bond strength of different adhesives tested in accordance with DIN 13990-1/-2 and using various methods of enamel conditioning.

Authors:  C Richter; P-G Jost-Brinkmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Periodontal ligament strain induced by different orthodontic bracket removal techniques: nonlinear finite-element comparison study.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson; Andrea Wichelhaus; Philipp Winterhalder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants.

Authors:  James Anthony Kolstad; Danielle Lynn Cianciolo; Alan James Ostertag; David William Berzins
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-08-07

5.  Effect of Fluoride Releasing Bonding Materials on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.

Authors:  Duygu Yetkin; Gülşilay Sayar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01

6.  Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems.

Authors:  Bora Oztürk; Siddik Malkoç; Alp Erdin Koyutürk; Bülent Catalbas; Füsun Ozer
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Shear bond strength of a bracket-bonding system cured with a light-emitting diode or halogen-based light-curing unit at various polymerization times.

Authors:  Sanjay Prasad Gupta; Basanta Kumar Shrestha
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2018-04-10

8.  Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations.

Authors:  Youssef S Al Jabbari; Sara M Al Taweel; Mohammed Al Rifaiy; Mohammed Q Alqahtani; Theodoros Koutsoukis; Spiros Zinelis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Shear bond strength of precoated orthodontic brackets: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2010-06-15

10.  The influence of no-primer adhesives and anchor pylons bracket bases on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Danilo Fraticelli; Paola Daina; Alessandra Tamagnone; Paola Gandini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.