Literature DB >> 12529868

Incremental net benefit in randomized clinical trials with quality-adjusted survival.

Andrew R Willan1, Eric Bingshu Chen, Richard J Cook, D Y Lin.   

Abstract

Owing to induced dependent censoring, estimating mean costs and quality-adjusted survival in a cost-effectiveness comparison of two groups using standard life-table methods leads to biased results. In this paper we propose methods for estimating the difference in mean costs and the difference in mean effectiveness, together with their respective variances and covariance in the presence of dependent censoring. We consider the situation in which the measure of effectiveness is either the probability of surviving a duration of interest or mean quality-adjusted survival time over a duration of interest. The methods are illustrated in an example using an incremental net benefit analysis. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12529868     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

Review 1.  Sample size determination for cost-effectiveness trials.

Authors:  Andrew R Willan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Probabilistic Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Vaccination for Mild or Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Kuen-Cheh Yang; Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Curr Alzheimer Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  On the censored cost-effectiveness analysis using copula information.

Authors:  Charles Fontaine; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Paul Landais
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Methods for estimating complier average causal effects for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  K DiazOrdaz; A J Franchini; R Grieve
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.483

5.  Economic evaluation of seasonal influenza vaccination in elderly and health workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Piyameth Dilokthornsakul; Le My Lan; Ammarin Thakkinstian; Raymond Hutubessy; Philipp Lambach; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  Economic evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rini Noviyani; Sitaporn Youngkong; Surakit Nathisuwan; Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Gareth McKay; Piyamitr Sritara; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2021-10-11

7.  The effect of fines on nonattendance in public hospital outpatient clinics: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emely Ek Blæhr; Thomas Kristensen; Ulla Væggemose; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  A randomized controlled efficacy trial of behavioral activation for concurrent stimulant use and sexual risk for HIV acquisition among MSM: project IMPACT study protocol.

Authors:  Matthew J Mimiaga; David W Pantalone; Katie B Biello; Tiffany Rose Glynn; Christopher M Santostefano; Jennifer Olson; Dana J Pardee; Jaclyn M W Hughto; Josibel Garcia Valles; Adam W Carrico; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.