Literature DB >> 12529023

Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation.

Claudia Mello-Thoms1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVE: The author performed this study to determine how image-based elements are translated into decisions by radiologists with different levels of experience in the reading of mammograms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three full-time mammographers and four radiology residents read 40 two-view mammogram cases. The observers' eye position was tracked while they searched the mammograms for malignancies. Spatial frequency analysis was performed to relate what the observers reported with where they looked.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were found between lesion-containing areas that attracted visual attention and were correctly interpreted and those that were visually inspected but not reported. In addition, an artificial neural network was successfully trained to map the image characteristics in the visually selected areas on a mammogram and to linkthem to a likely decision by the observer.
CONCLUSION: Spatial frequency analysis can be used to derive trends for how mammographers and radiology residents will respond to mammograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12529023     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80782-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

1.  Standalone computer-aided detection compared to radiologists' performance for the detection of mammographic masses.

Authors:  Rianne Hupse; Maurice Samulski; Marc Lobbes; Ard den Heeten; Mechli W Imhof-Tas; David Beijerinck; Ruud Pijnappel; Carla Boetes; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Cognitive processing differences of experts and novices when correlating anatomy and cross-sectional imaging.

Authors:  Lonie R Salkowski; Rosemary Russ
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-05-18

Review 3.  Review of prospects and challenges of eye tracking in volumetric imaging.

Authors:  Antje C Venjakob; Claudia R Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  Comparing search patterns in digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography: an eye tracking study.

Authors:  Avi Aizenman; Trafton Drew; Krista A Ehinger; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-27

5.  Let's Use Cognitive Science to Create Collaborative Workstations.

Authors:  Murray A Reicher; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Can a Machine Learn from Radiologists' Visual Search Behaviour and Their Interpretation of Mammograms-a Deep-Learning Study.

Authors:  Suneeta Mall; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Karla K Evans; Trafton Drew; Avigael Aizenman; Emilie Josephs
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.972

8.  Scan, dwell, decide: Strategies for detecting abnormalities in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Samrudhdhi B Rangrej; Jayanthi Sivaswamy; Priyanka Srivastava
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The Holistic Processing Account of Visual Expertise in Medical Image Perception: A Review.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.