Literature DB >> 12527046

Predictors of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.

Anurag K Singh1, Mary Ann Lockett, Jeffrey D Bradley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence and clinical/dosimetric predictors of acute and late Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 207 consecutive patients with NSCLC who were treated with high-dose, definitive 3D-CRT between March 1991 and December 1998. This population consisted of 107 men and 100 women. The median age was 67 years (range 31-90). The following patient and treatment parameters were studied: age, gender, race, performance status, sequential chemotherapy, concurrent chemotherapy, presence of subcarinal nodes, pretreatment weight loss, mean dose to the entire esophagus, maximal point dose to the esophagus, and percentage of volume of esophagus receiving >55 Gy. All doses are reported without heterogeneity corrections. The median prescription dose to the isocenter in this population was 70 Gy (range 60-74) delivered in 2-Gy daily fractions. All patients were treated once daily. Acute and late esophageal toxicities were graded by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Patient and clinical/dosimetric factors were coded and correlated with acute and late Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity using univariate and multivariate regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of 207 patients, 16 (8%) developed acute (10 patients) or late (13 patients) Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity. Seven patients had both acute and late Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity. One patient died (Grade 5 esophageal toxicity) of late esophageal perforation. Concurrent chemotherapy, maximal point dose to the esophagus >58 Gy, and a mean dose to the entire esophagus >34 Gy were significantly associated with a risk of Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity on univariate analysis. Concurrent chemotherapy and maximal point dose to the esophagus >58 Gy retained significance on multivariate analysis. Of 207 patients, 53 (26%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Fourteen (88%) of the 16 patients who developed Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity had received concurrent chemotherapy (p = 0.0001, Pearson's chi-square test). No case of Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity occurred in patients who received a maximal point dose to the esophagus of <58 Gy (p = 0.0001, Fisher's exact test, two-tail). Only 2 patients developed Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity in the absence of concurrent chemotherapy; both received a maximal esophageal point dose >69 Gy. All assessable patients who developed Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity had a mean dose to the entire esophagus >34 Gy (p = 0.0351, Pearson's chi-square test). However, the mean dose was not predictive on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemotherapy and the maximal esophageal point dose were significantly associated with a risk of Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity in patients with NSCLC treated with high-dose 3D-CRT. In patients who received concurrent chemotherapy, the threshold maximal esophageal point dose for Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity was 58 Gy. An insufficient number of patients developed Grade 3-5 esophageal toxicity in the absence of chemotherapy to allow a valid statistical analysis of the relationship between the maximal esophageal point dose and esophagitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12527046     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03937-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  44 in total

1.  A novel correction factor based on extended volume to complement the conformity index.

Authors:  F Jin; Y Wang; Y-Z Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Spanish radiobiological pattern of care in lung cancer: a GOECP/SEOR study.

Authors:  J A González; M Chust; R Delgado; A Gómez; N Rodríguez; M J Ruiz; F Casas
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the esophagus.

Authors:  Maria Werner-Wasik; Ellen Yorke; Joseph Deasy; Jiho Nam; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Radiotherapy and wound healing.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Dormand; Paul E Banwell; Timothy E E Goodacre
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Improved local control without elective nodal radiotherapy in patients with unresectable NSCLC treated by 3D-CRT.

Authors:  Kunyu Yang; Fengjun Cao; Jianhua Wang; Li Liu; Tao Zhang; Gang Wu
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2007-10-01

6.  Dosimetric predictors for acute esophagitis during radiation therapy for lung cancer: Results of a large statewide observational study.

Authors:  Peter Paximadis; Matthew Schipper; Martha Matuszak; Mary Feng; Shruti Jolly; Thomas Boike; Inga Grills; Larry Kestin; Benjamin Movsas; Kent Griffith; Gregory Gustafson; Jean Moran; Teamour Nurushev; Jeffrey Radawski; Lori Pierce; James Hayman
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19

7.  AP-PA field orientation followed by IMRT reduces lung exposure in comparison to conventional 3D conformal and sole IMRT in centrally located lung tumors.

Authors:  Viacheslav Soyfer; Yaron Meir; Benjamin W Corn; Dan Schifter; Eliahu Gez; Haim Tempelhoff; Natan Shtraus
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Node-positive left-sided breast cancer: does VMAT improve treatment plan quality with respect to IMRT?

Authors:  M Pasler; D Georg; S Bartelt; J Lutterbach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Phase I study of induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy with irinotecan, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas W Choong; Everett E Vokes; Daniel J Haraf; Peter K Tothy; Mark K Ferguson; Kristen Kasza; Charles M Rudin; Philip C Hoffman; Stuart A Krauss; Livia Szeto; Ann M Mauer
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 10.  Avoiding Severe Toxicity From Combined BRAF Inhibitor and Radiation Treatment: Consensus Guidelines from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

Authors:  Christopher J Anker; Kenneth F Grossmann; Michael B Atkins; Gita Suneja; Ahmad A Tarhini; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.