Literature DB >> 12522189

Effects of altering initial position on movement direction and extent.

Robert L Sainburg1, Jordan E Lateiner, Mark L Latash, Leia B Bagesteiro.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relative influence of initial hand location on the direction and extent of planar reaching movements. Subjects performed a horizontal-plane reaching task with the dominant arm supported above a table top by a frictionless air-jet system. A start circle and a target were reflected from a horizontal projection screen onto a horizontally positioned mirror, which blocked the subject's view of the arm. A cursor, representing either actual or virtual finger location, was only displayed between each trial to allow subjects to position the cursor in the start circle. Prior to occasional "probe trials," we changed the start location of the finger relative to the cursor. Subjects reported being unaware of the discrepancy between cursor and finger. Our results indicate that regardless of initial hand location, subjects did not alter the direction of movement. However, movement distance was systematically adjusted in accord with the baseline target position. Thus when the hand start position was perpendicularly displaced relative to the target direction, neither the direction nor the extent of movement varied relative to that of baseline. However, when the hand was displaced along the target direction, either anterior or posterior, movements were made in the same direction as baseline trials but were shortened or lengthened, respectively. This effect was asymmetrical such that movements from anterior displaced positions showed greater distance adjustment than those from posterior displaced positions. Inverse dynamic analysis revealed substantial changes in elbow and shoulder muscle torque strategies for both right/left and anterior/posterior pairs of displacements. In the case of right/left displacements, such changes in muscle torque compensated changes in limb configuration such that movements were made in the same direction and to the same extent as baseline trials. Our results support the hypothesis that movement direction is specified relative to an origin at the current location of the hand. Movement extent, on the other hand, appears to be affected by the workspace learned during baseline movement experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12522189     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00243.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Differential contributions of vision and proprioception to movement accuracy.

Authors:  Jordan E Lateiner; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Movement speed effects on limb position drift.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; David A Rosenbaum; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Developmental aspects of pluriarticular movement control.

Authors:  Isabelle Mackrous; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Overlapping representations for reach depth and direction in caudal superior parietal lobule of macaques.

Authors:  Kostas Hadjidimitrakis; Giulia Dal Bo'; Rossella Breveglieri; Claudio Galletti; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance.

Authors:  Leia B Bagesteiro; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Novel muscle patterns for reaching after cervical spinal cord injury: a case for motor redundancy.

Authors:  Gail F Koshland; James C Galloway; Becky Farley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The effect of target modality on visual and proprioceptive contributions to the control of movement distance.

Authors:  Fabrice R Sarlegna; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Separation of visual and motor workspaces during targeted reaching results in limited generalization of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Michelle J Johnson; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.