Literature DB >> 12520404

Linearity, symmetry and additivity of the human eye-movement response to maintained unilateral and bilateral surface galvanic (DC) vestibular stimulation.

Hamish G MacDougall1, Agatha E Brizuela, Ian S Curthoys.   

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that, although responses to long-duration, constant-current surface galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) show substantial interindividual variability, individual subjects show a reliable, repeatable, idiosyncratic oculomotor response pattern to GVS. It follows that GVS may be a more reliable stimulus than may have been anticipated from the literature. The aim of the present study was to examine the metrics of 3D eye-movement responses to maintained (120 s), unilateral and bilateral surface GVS. Eye movements were measured using computerised video-oculography. Two experiments were conducted: Experiment 1 examined whether the normal response is linear over increasing levels of current; and Experiment 2 examined (1) whether the normal response to surface GVS is symmetrical when comparing stimulated sides, (2) whether the normal response to surface GVS is symmetrical when the polarity of the stimulating current was reversed, and (3) whether there is additivity in the normal response to combinations of unilateral/bilateral surface GVS. Five subjects participated in Experiment 1 and eight subjects participated in Experiment 2. In both experiments, the onset of stimulation produced characteristic eye-movement responses: changes in torsional position with the upper pole of both eyes rolling towards the anode and away from the cathode; together with horizontal and torsional nystagmus with slow phases towards the anode and away from the cathode; and negligible vertical nystagmus. These responses reversed direction at stimulus offset. In the fixation condition of Experiment 1, the magnitude of ocular torsional position (OTP) and torsional nystagmus responses showed a linear relationship over conditions of increasing current strength, as did OTP, torsional and horizontal nystagmus responses in darkness. The results of Experiment 2 showed that responses to unilateral stimulation are symmetrical between stimulated sides, symmetrical between stimulating polarities, and additive (with respect to responses to bilateral stimulation). The principles derived from these findings, as well as those of recent studies, provide a foundation for future work investigating eye-movement responses to surface GVS in patients with known types of vestibular dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12520404     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1289-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Do you know where your arm is if you think your head has moved?

Authors:  Joanna J Knox; Michel W Coppieters; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modeling postural instability with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Hamish G MacDougall; Steven T Moore; Ian S Curthoys; F Owen Black
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Non-linear vector summation of left and right vestibular signals for human balance.

Authors:  Brian L Day; Jonathan F Marsden; Elijane Ramsay; Omar S Mian; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Direct perturbation of neural integrator by bilateral galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Kihwan Hong; Hyeon-Min Shim; Minsoo Goh; Seung-Yon Jang; Sangmin Lee; Kyu-Sung Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Non-associative learning processes in vestibular nucleus.

Authors:  Gyutae Kim; Kyu-Sung Kim; Sangmin Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Vestibular, locomotor, and vestibulo-autonomic research: 50 years of collaboration with Bernard Cohen.

Authors:  Theodore Raphan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sinusoidal galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS) induces a vasovagal response in the rat.

Authors:  Bernard Cohen; Giorgio P Martinelli; Dmitri Ogorodnikov; Yongqing Xiang; Theodore Raphan; Gay R Holstein; Sergei B Yakushin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Modeling locomotor dysfunction following spaceflight with Galvanic vestibular stimulation.

Authors:  Steven T Moore; Hamish G MacDougall; Brian T Peters; Jacob J Bloomberg; Ian S Curthoys; Helen S Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Vestibulo-ocular responses evoked via bilateral electrical stimulation of the lateral semicircular canals.

Authors:  Wangsong Gong; Csilla Haburcakova; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Transmastoid galvanic stimulation does not affect the vergence-mediated gain increase of the human angular vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.