OBJECTIVE: To determine if iron deficiency (ID) is longitudinally associated with lead poisoning. STUDY DESIGN: Blood lead levels, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW), insurance status, and age were determined for 1,275 children. ID was defined as MCV <70 fl and RDW >14.5 if age was <2 years and MCV <73 fl and RDW >14.5 if age was >/=2 years. Logistic regression models were constructed by using the second-visit blood lead levels dichotomized at >/=0.48 microm/L (10 microg/dL) as the outcome. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) for baseline ID predicting lead poisoning at the second visit was 4.12 (95% CI, 1.96-8.65). In the second model, using children who were iron-replete at both visits as the referent group, for children with ID at both visits, the OR for predicting lead poisoning at the second visit was 5.54 (95% CI, 2.25-13.62). For children with ID at the first visit and iron-replete at the second visit, the OR was 2.73 (95% CI, 0.90-8.27), and for children iron-replete at the first visit and ID at the second visit, the OR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.10-6.30). CONCLUSIONS: ID is associated with subsequent lead poisoning. These data are consistent with a biological mechanism of increased lead absorption among iron deficient children.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if iron deficiency (ID) is longitudinally associated with lead poisoning. STUDY DESIGN: Blood lead levels, hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW), insurance status, and age were determined for 1,275 children. ID was defined as MCV <70 fl and RDW >14.5 if age was <2 years and MCV <73 fl and RDW >14.5 if age was >/=2 years. Logistic regression models were constructed by using the second-visit blood lead levels dichotomized at >/=0.48 microm/L (10 microg/dL) as the outcome. RESULTS: The odds ratio (OR) for baseline ID predicting lead poisoning at the second visit was 4.12 (95% CI, 1.96-8.65). In the second model, using children who were iron-replete at both visits as the referent group, for children with ID at both visits, the OR for predicting lead poisoning at the second visit was 5.54 (95% CI, 2.25-13.62). For children with ID at the first visit and iron-replete at the second visit, the OR was 2.73 (95% CI, 0.90-8.27), and for childreniron-replete at the first visit and ID at the second visit, the OR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.10-6.30). CONCLUSIONS: ID is associated with subsequent lead poisoning. These data are consistent with a biological mechanism of increased lead absorption among iron deficient children.
Authors: Guido Filler; Elizabeth Roach; Abeer Yasin; Ajay P Sharma; Peter G Blake; Liju Yang Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.714
Authors: Katarzyna Kordas; Rachael Burganowski; Aditi Roy; Fabiana Peregalli; Valentina Baccino; Elizabeth Barcia; Soledad Mangieri; Virginia Ocampo; Nelly Mañay; Gabriela Martínez; Marie Vahter; Elena I Queirolo Journal: Environ Int Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: David Cantonwine; Howard Hu; Martha Maria Téllez-Rojo; Brisa N Sánchez; Héctor Lamadrid-Figueroa; Adrienne S Ettinger; Adriana Mercado-García; Mauricio Hernández-Avila; Robert O Wright Journal: Environ Health Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 5.984