Literature DB >> 12519285

Development and testing of the theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for triads.

Joanne M Dalton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although nurses depend heavily on informal family caregivers to provide care to clients and to be involved in care planning and decision-making, no nursing theories that include the client, the caregiver, and the nurse were available to guide collaborative care planning and decision-making. AIM: The purpose of this paper is to describe the construction and initial testing of the theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for a triad. The theory represents an extension of Kim's theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice. Kim's theory was developed to describe and explain collaborative decision-making in a dyad (client and nurse). The inclusion of a third person (family caregiver) in the theory required the addition of concepts about the caregiver, coalition formation, and nurse and caregiver outcomes. The expansion of Kim's dyadic theory to a triadic theory was achieved by means of a modified version of the theory derivation process described by Walker and Avant.
CONCLUSIONS: The theory of collaborative decision-making in nursing practice for a triad can be used to guide further research and clinical practice. The theory provides a framework for researchers who are interested in studying the effects of collaboration regarding decision-making among nurses, family caregivers, and clients. The initial testing of the new theory in home health care nursing revealed variety in the nature of the client-caregiver-nurse relationships, the many processes used by the nurses in proceeding with the home visits, a multitude of decisions considered and different collaborative, noncollaborative, and coalition-forming interactions. The limited evidence of the empirical adequacy of the theory precludes development of definitive guidelines for clinical practice at this time. More studies are required before clinical practice guidelines can be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12519285     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02502.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  7 in total

1.  Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Robyn L Birdwell; Brittany L Bychkovsky; Lindsay Hintz; Valerie Fein-Zachary; Michael D Wertheimer; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Factors noted to affect breast cancer treatment decisions of women aged 80 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Rebecca A Silliman; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Radhika A Ramanan; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  An integrated review of interventions to improve psychological outcomes in caregivers of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Lorraine S Evangelista; Anna Strömberg; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.302

5.  External validation of an index to predict up to 9-year mortality of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Roger B Davis; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  What Does "Patient-Centered" Mean? Qualitative Perspectives from Older Adults and Family Caregivers.

Authors:  Minakshi Raj; Jodyn E Platt; Denise Anthony; James T Fitzgerald; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2021-05-20

7.  Ethical violations in the clinical setting: the hidden curriculum learning experience of Pakistani nurses.

Authors:  Sara Rizvi Jafree; Rubeena Zakar; Florian Fischer; Muhammad Zakria Zakar
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.