Lorraine S Evangelista1, Anna Strömberg, J Nicholas Dionne-Odom. 1. aUCI Program in Nursing Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California bDepartment of Medical and Health Sciences and Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden cSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article examines interventions aimed at improving psychological outcomes (e.g., caregiver burden, quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived control, stress mastery, caregiver confidence and preparedness, and caregiver mastery) in family caregivers of patients with heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The most common intervention involved psychoeducation facilitated by a nurse (6/8) and supplemented with a combination of follow-up face-to-face sessions (2/6), home visits (2/6), telephone calls (3/6), and telemonitoring (3/6). Two studies used a support group intervention of four to six sessions. Half of the interventions reported a significant effect on one or more primary outcomes, including caregiver burden (n = 4), depressive symptoms (n = 1), stress mastery (n = 1), caregiver confidence and preparedness (n = 1), and caregiver mastery (n = 1). SUMMARY: Compared with dementia and cancer family caregiving, few interventions have been evaluated in caregivers of patients with heart failure. Of the existing interventions identified in this review, considerable variability was observed in aims, intervention content, delivery methods, duration, intensity, methodological rigor, outcomes, and effects. Given this current state of the science, direct comparison of heart failure caregiver interventions and recommendations for clinical practice are premature. Thus, research priority is strongly warranted for intervention development and testing to enhance heart failure caregiver support and education.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article examines interventions aimed at improving psychological outcomes (e.g., caregiver burden, quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived control, stress mastery, caregiver confidence and preparedness, and caregiver mastery) in family caregivers of patients with heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The most common intervention involved psychoeducation facilitated by a nurse (6/8) and supplemented with a combination of follow-up face-to-face sessions (2/6), home visits (2/6), telephone calls (3/6), and telemonitoring (3/6). Two studies used a support group intervention of four to six sessions. Half of the interventions reported a significant effect on one or more primary outcomes, including caregiver burden (n = 4), depressive symptoms (n = 1), stress mastery (n = 1), caregiver confidence and preparedness (n = 1), and caregiver mastery (n = 1). SUMMARY: Compared with dementia and cancer family caregiving, few interventions have been evaluated in caregivers of patients with heart failure. Of the existing interventions identified in this review, considerable variability was observed in aims, intervention content, delivery methods, duration, intensity, methodological rigor, outcomes, and effects. Given this current state of the science, direct comparison of heart failure caregiver interventions and recommendations for clinical practice are premature. Thus, research priority is strongly warranted for intervention development and testing to enhance heart failure caregiver support and education.
Authors: Susan C McMillan; Brent J Small; William E Haley; Cheryl Zambroski; Harleah G Buck Journal: J Hosp Palliat Nurs Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 1.918
Authors: Barbara Riegel; Alexandra L Hanlon; Norma B Coe; Karen B Hirschman; Gladys Thomas; Michael Stawnychy; Joyce W Wald; Kathryn H Bowles Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-09-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Karen B Hirschman; Kathryn H Bowles; Lydia Garcia-Gonzalez; Brooke Shepard; Tracie J Walser; Gladys L Thomas; Michael A Stawnychy; Barbara Riegel Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-12-20 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Waguih William IsHak; Samuel Korouri; Tarneem Darwish; Brigitte Vanle; Jonathan Dang; Gabriel Edwards; Jeanne T Black; Harriet Aronow; Asher Kimchi; Brennan Spiegel; Rebecca Hedrick; Robert Chernoff; Marcio A Diniz; James Mirocha; Vicki Manoukian; John Harold; Michael K Ong; Kenneth Wells; Michele Hamilton; Itai Danovitch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Deborah B Ejem; Rachel Wells; Andres Azuero; Macy L Stockdill; Konda Keebler; Elizabeth Sockwell; Sheri Tims; Sally Engler; Elizabeth Kvale; Raegan W Durant; Rodney O Tucker; Kathryn L Burgio; Jose Tallaj; Salpy V Pamboukian; Keith M Swetz; Marie A Bakitas Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-04-01