Literature DB >> 12519027

Influences of hand posture and hand position on compatibility effects for up-down stimuli mapped to left-right responses: evidence for a hand referent hypothesis.

Yang Seok Cho1, Robert W Proctor.   

Abstract

Unimanual left-right responses to up-down stimuli show a stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect for which the preferred mapping varies as a function of response eccentricity. Responses made in the right hemispace and, to a lesser extent, at a midline position, are faster with the up-right/down-left mapping than with the up-left/down-right mapping, but responses made in the left hemispace are faster with the up-left/down-right mapping. Also, for responses at the midline position, the preferred mapping switches when the hand is placed in a supine posture instead of the more usual prone posture. The response eccentricity effect can be explained in terms of correspondence of asymmetrically coded stimulus and response features, but it is not obvious whether the hand posture effect can be explained in a similar manner. The present study tested the implications of a hypothesis that the body of the hand provides a frame of reference with respect to which the response switch is coded as left or right. As was predicted by this hand referent hypothesis, Experiment 1 showed that the influence of hand posture (prone and supine) on orthogonal SRC was additive with that of response location. In Experiment 2, the location of the switch relative to the hand was varied by having subjects use either a normal grip in which the switch was held between the thumb and the index finger or a grip in which it was held between the little and the ring fingers. The magnitudes of the mapping preferences varied as a function of the grip and hand posture in a manner consistent with the hand referent hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12519027     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

2.  Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-22

3.  Do task-irrelevant direction-associated motion verbs affect action planning? Evidence from a Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Carolin Dudschig; Martin Lachmair; Irmgard de la Vega; Monica De Filippis; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

4.  Intentional control of visual processing benefits from referential objects.

Authors:  Nicole M Murchison; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

5.  Imitation or Polarity Correspondence? Behavioural and Neurophysiological Evidence for the Confounding Influence of Orthogonal Spatial Compatibility on Measures of Automatic Imitation.

Authors:  Kristína Czekóová; Daniel Joel Shaw; Martin Lamoš; Beáta Špiláková; Miguel Salazar; Milan Brázdil
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  High skies and oceans deep: polarity benefits or mental simulation?

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-10

7.  Polarity correspondence effect between loudness and lateralized response set.

Authors:  Seah Chang; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-22

8.  The stuff that motor chunks are made of: Spatial instead of motor representations?

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Eduard C Groen; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hand posture effects on handedness recognition as revealed by the simon effect.

Authors:  Allan P Lameira; Luiz G Gawryszewski; Sabrina Guimarães-Silva; Fernanda M Ferreira; Cláudia D Vargas; Carlo Umiltà; Antônio Pereira
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Control of automated behavior: insights from the discrete sequence production task.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Marit F L Ruitenberg; Elian de Kleine; Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.