Literature DB >> 12518985

Relative biological effectiveness of 290 MeV/u carbon ions for the growth delay of a radioresistant murine fibrosarcoma.

Sachiko Koike1, Koichi Ando, Chisa Oohira, Takeshi Fukawa, Ryonfa Lee, Nobuhiko Takai, Manami Monobe, Yoshiya Furusawa, Mizuho Aoki, Shigeru Yamada, Wakako Shimizu, Kumie Nojima, Hideyuki Majima.   

Abstract

The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for animal tumors treated with fractionated doses of 290 MeV/u carbon ions was studied. The growth delay of NFSa fibrosarcoma in mice was investigated following various daily doses given with carbon ions or those given with cesium gamma-rays, and the RBE was determined. Animal tumors were irradiated with carbon ions of various LET (linear energy transfer) in a 6-cm SOBP (spread-out Bragg peak), and the isoeffect doses; i.e. the dose necessary to induce a tumor growth delay of 15 days were studied. The iso-effect dose for carbon ions of 14 and 20 keV/microm increased with an increase in the number of fractions up to 4 fractions. The increase in the isoeffect dose with the fraction number was small for carbon ions of 44 keV/microm, and was not observed for 74 keV/microm. The alpha and beta values of the linear-quadratic model for the radiation dose-cell survival relationship were calculated by the Fe-plot analysis method. The alpha values increased linearly with an increase in the LET, while the beta values were independent of the LET. The alpha/beta ratio was 129 +/- 10 Gy for gamma-rays, and increased with an increase in the LET, reaching 475 +/- 168 Gy for 74 keV/microm carbon ions. The RBE for carbon ions relative to Cs-137 gamma-rays increased with the LET. The RBE values for 14 and 20 keV/microm carbon ions were 1.4 and independent of the number of fractions, while those for 44 and 74 keV/microm increased from 1.8 to 2.3 and from 2.4 to 3.0, respectively, when the number of fractions increased from 1 to 4. Increasing the number of fractions further from 4 to 6 was not associated with an increase in the RBE. These results together with our earlier study on the skin reaction support the use of an RBE of 3.0 in clinical trials of 80 keV/microm carbon beams. The RBE values for low doses of carbon beams were also considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12518985     DOI: 10.1269/jrr.43.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  8 in total

1.  The major DNA repair pathway after both proton and carbon-ion radiation is NHEJ, but the HR pathway is more relevant in carbon ions.

Authors:  Ariungerel Gerelchuluun; Eri Manabe; Takaaki Ishikawa; Lue Sun; Kazuya Itoh; Takeji Sakae; Kenshi Suzuki; Ryoichi Hirayama; Aroumougame Asaithamby; David J Chen; Koji Tsuboi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  [11C]Gefitinib ([11c]Iressa): radiosynthesis, in vitro uptake, and in vivo imaging of intact murine fibrosarcoma.

Authors:  Ming-Rong Zhang; Katsushi Kumata; Akiko Hatori; Nobuhiko Takai; Jun Toyohara; Tomoteru Yamasaki; Kazuhiko Yanamoto; Joji Yui; Kazunori Kawamura; Sachiko Koike; Koichi Ando; Kazutoshi Suzuki
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Characterizing the Potency and Impact of Carbon Ion Therapy in a Primary Mouse Model of Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Jeremy M Brownstein; Amy J Wisdom; Katherine D Castle; Yvonne M Mowery; Peter Guida; Chang-Lung Lee; Francesco Tommasino; Chiara La Tessa; Emanuele Scifoni; Junheng Gao; Lixia Luo; Lorraine Da Silva Campos; Yan Ma; Nerissa Williams; Sin-Ho Jung; Marco Durante; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.009

4.  Carbon ion radiotherapy: impact of tumor differentiation on local control in experimental prostate carcinomas.

Authors:  Christin Glowa; Peter Peschke; Stephan Brons; Oliver C Neels; Klaus Kopka; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Monte Carlo investigation of the characteristics of radioactive beams for heavy ion therapy.

Authors:  Andrew Chacon; Mitra Safavi-Naeini; David Bolst; Susanna Guatelli; Daniel R Franklin; Yuma Iwao; Go Akamatsu; Hideaki Tashima; Eiji Yoshida; Fumihiko Nishikido; Atsushi Kitagawa; Akram Mohammadi; Marie-Claude Gregoire; Taiga Yamaya; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Carbon Ion Radiobiology.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Basics of particle therapy II: relative biological effectiveness.

Authors:  Jinhyun Choi; Jin Oh Kang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2012-03-31

8.  Salvage surgery and microsurgical reconstruction for recurrence of skull base osteosarcoma after carbon ion radiotherapy.

Authors:  Keishi Kohyama; Kenji Yamada; Hideshi Sugiura; Ikuo Hyodo; Taijiro Ozawa; Yasuhisa Hasegawa; Hisakazu Kato; Yuzuru Kamei
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.131

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.